You're struggling to balance manual testing and automated tests. How can you achieve comprehensive coverage?

Achieving comprehensive test coverage requires a strategic approach to balancing manual testing and automated tests. Start by defining clear goals and objectives for each type of testing: automate repetitive tests and scenarios prone to human error while reserving manual testing for exploratory, complex scenarios, and usability assessments. Prioritize critical areas based on risk and business impact to allocate resources effectively. Regularly review and adjust the testing strategy to optimize coverage and efficiency, ensuring both manual and automated tests complement each other seamlessly.

To achieve comprehensive coverage while balancing manual and automated testing, prioritize automating repetitive, time-consuming, and critical test cases. Use a hybrid approach, automating stable tests and reserving manual testing for exploratory and complex scenarios. Select the right tools like Selenium and Appium, and integrate automated tests into CI/CD pipelines with Jenkins for continuous testing. Develop reusable scripts, regularly update test suites, and monitor test results to address issues promptly. This strategic approach ensures efficient and effective test coverage.

Manual focus in testing refers to the practice of performing tests and validations manually, without relying on automated tools or scripts. This approach involves human testers executing test cases, exploring the software's functionality, and verifying its behavior against expected outcomes. Manual focus allows testers to apply critical thinking, intuition, and creativity to uncover potential issues that automated tests might overlook. It is particularly valuable for exploratory testing, usability testing, and scenarios where human judgment and observation are essential. Manual testing also helps in evaluating the user interface, user experience, and real-world usability of the software.

I wrote 50 manual tests said a tester and he got great praises, another tester said I automated 10 of them he also got pat on the back. In both these cases did we have enough coverage, do we need 50 test cases and how are we sure 10 automated tests cover what its manual counterpart was asking it to. Reviews are one of the important means to ensure what is supposed to be covered is written and what is written is automated. Remember those whose execute and run tests would change but what gets executed is confirmed through reviews