How can you evaluate ROS navigation stack accuracy?

If you are working with robotics, you might have used or heard of ROS, the Robot Operating System. ROS is a framework that provides a set of tools and libraries for developing and running robotic applications. One of the key components of ROS is the navigation stack, which enables a robot to move autonomously in a given environment. But how can you evaluate how well the navigation stack performs? How can you measure the accuracy of the robot's localization, path planning, and obstacle avoidance? In this article, we will introduce some methods and tools that can help you answer these questions.

1 Setup and configuration

Before you can evaluate the navigation stack, you need to have a working setup and configuration of your robot and its sensors. You need to make sure that your robot has a proper odometry source, such as wheel encoders or IMU, and a map of the environment, either pre-built or generated by SLAM. You also need to tune the parameters of the navigation stack, such as the costmap resolution, the inflation radius, the planner frequency, and the controller gains. You can use the rqt_reconfigure tool to adjust these parameters dynamically and observe their effects.

Add your perspective

Load more contributions

2 Ground truth and error metrics

To evaluate the accuracy of the navigation stack, you need to have a way to compare the robot's estimated pose and trajectory with the ground truth. The ground truth is the actual position and orientation of the robot in the world, which can be obtained by external sensors or markers, such as a motion capture system or a GPS. The error metrics are the quantitative measures of the difference between the estimated and the ground truth values, such as the root mean square error (RMSE), the absolute trajectory error (ATE), or the relative pose error (RPE). You can use tools like evo or rqt_bag to compute and visualize these error metrics.

Add your perspective

3 Simulation and testing

One of the advantages of ROS is that it allows you to simulate and test your navigation stack in a virtual environment, before deploying it on a real robot. You can use tools like Gazebo or Stage to create realistic scenarios and environments, and use plugins like gazebo_ros or stage_ros to interface with the ROS nodes. You can also use tools like rosbag or rosbag2 to record and replay sensor data and navigation commands. By simulating and testing your navigation stack, you can evaluate its performance under different conditions and situations, and identify and fix any issues or bugs.

Add your perspective

Rushikesh Deshmukh

Robotics Engineer | AI Engineer at Lumasort LLC
Report contribution
Delving into the world of ROS2 navigation, it's crucial to emphasize the significance of simulation and testing in ensuring robust and reliable performance. Evaluating navigation algorithms within a simulated environment offers a cost-effective and efficient means to validate their effectiveness before deploying them in the real world. ROS2's integration with simulation platforms allows developers to recreate complex scenarios, fine-tune parameters, and assess how robots navigate various terrains and obstacles. This iterative process not only accelerates development but also enhances the overall reliability of navigation systems.

Like

4 Benchmarking and comparison

Another way to evaluate the navigation stack is to benchmark and compare it with other navigation methods or systems. You can use tools like nav2_benchmarking or ros2_control_benchmark_tool to collect and analyze data from different navigation algorithms or controllers, and compare their results in terms of accuracy, speed, robustness, and efficiency. You can also use tools like nav2_system_tests or ros2_test to run standardized tests and scenarios, and compare your navigation stack with the official ROS 2 navigation stack or other open-source alternatives.

Add your perspective

5 Feedback and improvement

The final step in evaluating the navigation stack is to use the feedback and data from the previous steps to improve your navigation system. You can use tools like rqt_plot or rqt_console to monitor and debug the navigation stack, and identify any errors or warnings. You can also use tools like rqt_graph or ros2doctor to inspect and diagnose the communication and health of the ROS nodes and topics. By using the feedback and improvement tools, you can optimize and fine-tune your navigation stack, and achieve better performance and reliability.

Add your perspective

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

How can you evaluate ROS navigation stack accuracy?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Setup and configuration

2 Ground truth and error metrics

3 Simulation and testing

4 Benchmarking and comparison

5 Feedback and improvement

6 Here’s what else to consider

Robotics

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Robotics

More relevant reading

How can you evaluate ROS navigation stack accuracy?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Setup and configuration

2 Ground truth and error metrics

3 Simulation and testing

4 Benchmarking and comparison

5 Feedback and improvement

6 Here’s what else to consider

Robotics

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

Explore Other Skills