How can you manage feedback from multiple sources in meetings?

Before starting a feedback meeting, know why you're having it: what you want to achieve and how you'll measure success. Identify who's involved and what they're supposed to do. Tell everyone beforehand what the meeting is about and what will be discussed. Remind them at the start of the meeting too. This keeps everyone on track and avoids repeating things that aren't useful. It helps to make the meeting more effective and focused on getting things done.

Managing feedback in meetings demands structure amidst diverse inputs. It requires active engagement, prioritization, and actionable planning for meaningful outcomes - Structured Approach: Set clear protocols for feedback collection, using digital tools or specific meeting segments - Active Participation: Encourage engagement, summarize inputs, and seek clarification - Prioritize and Document: Identify key feedback points, record systematically - Consolidate and Analyze: Organize feedback post-meeting, analyze for insights and patterns - Action Planning: Develop an actionable plan based on feedback, assign responsibilities and timelines - Follow-Up: Communicate outcomes, attributing changes to contributors, fostering continuous improvement

Absolutely, having a clear purpose, defined criteria for success, and communicating this information to participants in advance is crucial for effective feedback sessions. It sets expectations, keeps discussions focused, and ensures everyone is aligned on the goals, reducing the likelihood of off-topic contributions. It is a proactive approach to streamline the feedback process and make the most out of the meeting.

Una de las acciones que he tenido la experiencia y que me parece muy productiva, es enviar una pre lectura de la agenda o del tema dando el contexto, para que lleven sus aportes ya elaborados en la reunión y así ésta sea más productiva.

To manage feedback from multiple sources in meetings, establish clear communication channels, encourage diverse perspectives, use technology for real-time collaboration, prioritize and summarize key points, and follow up with action items.

Setting ground rules is a great strategy for fostering a constructive and respectful feedback environment. By encouraging positive language, discouraging personal attacks, and emphasizing active listening, you create a culture that values diverse perspectives. Time limits and a designated facilitator further contribute to a focused and efficient feedback session, ensuring that discussions remain productive and respectful.

Indeed, feedback frameworks provide structure and clarity. SBI and STAR are effective frameworks for different contexts. SBI emphasizes the situation, behavior, and impact, fostering a comprehensive understanding, while STAR focuses on the situation, task, action, and result, emphasizing specific actions and outcomes. Choosing the right framework aligns with your goals, making feedback more actionable and minimizing ambiguity.

Summarizing and prioritizing feedback is essential for effective action. Visual tools like feedback matrices or grids help categorize and rank feedback, aiding in identifying key themes and patterns. Criteria such as urgency, importance, feasibility, or alignment can guide this process. Additionally, involving participants through a voting system like dot voting fosters collaborative decision-making and ensures that prioritization reflects collective perspectives. This approach enhances the clarity and impact of subsequent actions based on the feedback received.

360-Degree Feedback, This widely used approach involves gathering feedback from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes external stakeholders. Hence, it provides a comprehensive view of an individual's performance and interpersonal skills