There are different ways to measure the readability of a text, depending on the level of analysis and the criteria used. One common way is to use readability formulas, which are mathematical equations that estimate the reading difficulty of a text based on some numerical features, such as the average number of words per sentence, the average number of syllables per word, or the percentage of unfamiliar words. Some examples of readability formulas are the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Gunning Fog Index, and the SMOG Index. These formulas can provide a quick and objective estimate of the readability of a text, but they also have some limitations, such as ignoring the semantic and pragmatic aspects of the text, or being biased towards certain languages or genres.
Another way to measure the readability of a text is to use human ratings, which are subjective evaluations of the reading difficulty of a text by real readers, often based on a scale or a rubric. Some examples of human ratings are the Lexile Framework, the Fry Graph, and the Coh-Metrix L2 Reading Index. These ratings can capture some aspects of the readability of a text that formulas cannot, such as the coherence, cohesion, and relevance of the text, or the prior knowledge and interest of the reader. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as being time-consuming, costly, and inconsistent across different raters or tasks.