Scope 1 for you may be scope 3 for a counter party. Thus stakeholders will measure and look at indicators differently. You need to find a common ground and work on those jointly. For your scope 1 it is better to work with competition and activists for greater support. For example steel industry needs to find recycled raw material. Your other stakeholders may not find this important but your competition will.

Focus on identifying overlapping goals, such as environmental impact, economic efficiency, or social responsibility, to find common ground. Propose a framework that includes a mix of core indicators reflecting shared objectives and supplementary indicators for specific stakeholder interests. Provide data and case studies to demonstrate how selected indicators drive meaningful outcomes, fostering buy-in. Regularly review and refine these indicators with stakeholder input, ensuring flexibility and alignment as sustainability goals evolve over time. This inclusive approach can unify diverse perspectives while creating a balanced set of indicators.

Here's how I've addressed such challenges: 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘂𝗲: I organize workshops or roundtables where stakeholders can openly express their concerns, priorities, and constraints. 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗼𝗮𝗹𝘀: I focus on identifying overlapping interests. For example, in a climate resilience project, stakeholders with differing agendas (e.g., economic growth vs. conservation) aligned around the shared goal of reducing climate risks, enabling collaborative solutions. 𝗟𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲-𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀: Using robust data to frame discussions often transforms disagreements into productive debates.

When stakeholders are divided on sustainability indicators, fostering alignment requires collaboration and clear communication. Begin by facilitating open discussions to understand their priorities, concerns, and the reasons behind differing viewpoints. Identify common goals and emphasize how shared indicators can serve mutual interests, such as regulatory compliance, cost savings, or market competitiveness. Use data-driven insights to clarify the relevance and impact of proposed metrics. Encourage a participatory approach by co-creating indicators, ensuring all voices are heard. Regularly revisit and refine these metrics to adapt to evolving needs, building trust and unity for long-term sustainability progress.

Start by facilitating open discussions where all parties can share their perspectives on sustainability indicators. Use industry benchmarks and peer comparisons to establish a common baseline for measurement. Create a balanced framework that addresses diverse stakeholder priorities while maintaining alignment with recognized sustainability standards. Focus on developing metrics that are both meaningful and practical to track, ensuring they provide value to all stakeholders. Build consensus through pilot programs that demonstrate the effectiveness of selected indicators, and maintain flexibility to adjust based on stakeholder feedback and real-world performance.