What is the most effective way to evaluate problem solving frameworks for media production?

1 Criteria 1: Scope

The first criterion to consider is the scope of the problem solving framework, which refers to how broadly or narrowly it defines the problem and the solution. Some frameworks are more general and can be applied to a wide range of problems, while others are more specific and tailored to a particular type of problem. For example, the Design Thinking framework is a general approach that can be used for any kind of creative problem, while the SCAMPER technique is a specific method that focuses on generating new ideas by modifying existing ones. Depending on the nature and complexity of your problem, you may need a framework that is more or less comprehensive and flexible.

2 Criteria 2: Process

The second criterion to consider is the process of the problem solving framework, which refers to how it guides you through the steps of finding and implementing a solution. Some frameworks are more linear and sequential, while others are more iterative and cyclical. For example, the PDCA cycle is a linear framework that follows four steps: Plan, Do, Check, and Act. The Lean Startup framework is an iterative framework that follows three steps: Build, Measure, and Learn. Depending on the level of uncertainty and feedback that you have, you may need a framework that is more or less structured and adaptable.

3 Criteria 3: Tools

The third criterion to consider is the tools of the problem solving framework, which refer to the techniques and methods that it uses to help you generate, evaluate, and communicate ideas. Some frameworks are more analytical and logical, while others are more creative and intuitive. For example, the Six Thinking Hats framework is an analytical tool that helps you examine a problem from different perspectives, while the Brainstorming technique is a creative tool that helps you generate a large number of ideas quickly. Depending on the type and quality of ideas that you need, you may need a framework that is more or less rational and imaginative.

4 Criteria 4: Outcomes

The fourth criterion to consider is the outcomes of the problem solving framework, which refer to the results and impacts that it produces for you and your stakeholders. Some frameworks are more focused on delivering a final product or service, while others are more focused on learning and improving along the way. For example, the Waterfall model is a framework that aims to deliver a complete and flawless solution at the end of the project, while the Agile model is a framework that aims to deliver incremental and valuable solutions throughout the project. Depending on the expectations and satisfaction of your customers and users, you may need a framework that is more or less product-oriented and customer-oriented.

By using these four criteria, you can evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different problem solving frameworks for your media production projects, and choose the one that best suits your needs and goals. However, keep in mind that there is no one-size-fits-all solution, and you may need to combine or modify different frameworks to fit your specific context and situation. The key is to be flexible and open-minded, and to test and refine your solutions until you find the optimal one.

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?