You're juggling conflicting suggestions on content structure. How do you determine the best course of action?

I go with the flow and the structure should align with my thought train. Then, I perambulate. I never keep breaks while writing articles because it affects my writing. I only start with a very good topical sentence. Later, premises fall into place. It comes with experience and you can judge if one has it in them.

When juggling conflicting suggestions on content structure, start by identifying the primary goals and audience of the content. Prioritize suggestions that align with these objectives. Analyze the rationale behind each suggestion, considering factors like clarity, flow, and engagement. Seek input from key stakeholders and, if possible, test different versions with a sample audience to gather feedback. Combine the best elements from each suggestion to create a cohesive and effective structure. Ultimately, aim for a content structure that best serves the audience's needs and enhances the overall message.

The above summary presents an ideal mindset, and though it might take some time to develop it really is progressive once in action. Receiving constructive criticism is a great boon for any creative mind, and as time has taught me, it is always best to take everyone's suggestions in good spirits and then make a choice suitable to the given context and our own intuition as the creator. Overthinking on the available alternatives might only exhaust your time and energy, which is why it might be best to deal with things in a cyclic fashion to avoid any roadblocks or moments of mental fatigue.

Before working on any content piece, one must first try to ensure that they're aware about who they're writing the content for. This is an essential step because the structure of content depends upon the target reader. You need to find what tone you'll use, whether there'll be jargons or not, and what degree of conciseness you need to have in the content. For instance, You won't have same choice of words for a content generated for students and that of generated for PHD scholars.

What your audience needs and likes is essential and needs to be put at the top. Assessing revisions suggestions or changes should be done in such a way that it does not compromise on your audience’s preferences

While this perspective definitely holds true, sometimes it might be a good idea to break the monotony of having to follow popular trends. When one scrolls through Social Media platforms between high intensity work/ study sessions, the brain should likely be awarded with some new information/ unique perspective (that is both visually and ideally different from the prevailing current) since it can essentially maintain the heightened mental balance achieved during a concentrated activity. If creators can manoeuvre to create content which brings users closer to our real lives than increasing our engagement in an alternate digital universe, today's technology can really achieve what it was truly meant for.

I will draw a simple diagram for each way (potentially 2-3) of organising the content. Then I will look closely at each diagram and see how well it matches what I want people to learn and who will be taking the course. You can always combine elements from different structures to create a unique approach that works for your specific course.