What do you do if your software architecture approaches clash?

Firstly, assessed the core difference between the approaches that clashed. Secondly compared the difference against the outcomes that need to be delivered. Thirdly, had an open dialogue with all stakeholders and lay out all the facts gathered. This is to ensure that all views are taken into consideration and all possible angle covered. Lastly, adapt a agile approach to prototype and test

Context matters. Selection of best approach not to be only from the perspective of project on hand. Must look at the bigger picture from business/organization perspective. One project is not created in isolation, but it is meant for expansion, enhancement, or improvement of business/services and tech eco systems that support it. So whatever approach, it should strengthen the foundation that successive solutions can be built upon.

First step is important understand problem very clearly. To provide structural thinking, break it into following: 1. Problem classification: A. Is this technology problem? B. Is this business problem? C. Is this tech n business problem? D. Is this people or process related challenges. E. Is this delivery/timeliness related challenges. F. Is this cost related challenges? G. Others Following get into deeper assessment/ root cause. This approach would make us clear, what problem we are looking to solve ?

Assessing the impact of conflicting software architecture approaches involves evaluating how each approach affects project timelines, budgets, scalability, maintainability, performance, and overall project goals. By considering these factors, we can make informed decisions about which approach to prioritize or how to reconcile conflicting approaches to minimize negative consequences and maximize project success.

1.Inform current situation to stack holders as soon as possible 2.Prapare details analysis of impacted areas for change 3.Analyse what are possible alternat to fix this 4.Keep ready POCs (if possible) for Alternate solution in order to gain stack holders confidence and fast approval/decision making 5.What should be cost and time impact 6.Start implementation following full agile approach 7. Revalidate if new architecture is working fine on the instances where earlier it was clash

Open dialog / conversation would shape the direction, however it is very important to invite right participants who is having deeper knowledge in the subject. The participants could be internal or external. Gather/record key facts along with supporting data from the meetings.

Best approach is to have a Dialogue, not only with the original team, but also with some cross team members as well. It is always good to have more brains, if you are struggling to get to the conclusion. They will not only help you make a better decision, but they may also share some out of the box insight, which is totally missing at the first place. During the dialogue, it is best to list the merits, demerits and perform a fair rating, with weightage. Do not treat one size fits for all. Example, a complex application should have a micro-service-based architecture, but a simpler one not necessarily be broken down. This may create extra effort and poor performance. Then conclude and take fair opinion of cross team members and all involved

When software architecture approaches clash, it's like finding yourself in the middle of a tug-of-war game. Everyone has their own idea of how things should be built, and it can get pretty heated. But instead of letting it turn into a full-blown showdown, I believe in sitting down together, grabbing a coffee, and having a real heart-to-heart chat. We listen to each other's reasons, concerns, and visions for the project. Sometimes, we find a middle ground that combines the best of both worlds, and other times, we brainstorm new ideas that nobody had thought of before. The key is to keep the conversation open, honest, and respectful, so we can find a solution that works for everyone.

Open Communication: Encourage open dialogue among team members involved in the conflicting approaches. Allow everyone to express their viewpoints and concerns without judgment. Decision-making Process: Establish a transparent decision-making process to resolve conflicts, whether through voting, executive decision, or consensus-building, depending on the project's dynamics.

When faced with conflicting software architecture approaches, it's like hitting a roadblock on a journey. Instead of getting stuck, we explore alternative routes to keep moving forward. We brainstorm different ideas, consider out-of-the-box solutions, and think about how we can blend the best elements of each approach. It's like searching for hidden paths on a map – sometimes, the unexpected routes lead to the most exciting discoveries. By exploring alternatives, we can find creative ways to address the clash and find a solution that meets everyone's needs.

Prior to initiate meeting with key stakeholders to make decision. It is important to capture problem statement, solution options along with option analysis considering key influencing parameters with inclusion of pros and cons. All the supporting facts n stats to be made available which are used in option analysis. The option analysis, along with recommended option with rationale to be shared with all the stockholders much prior to meeting.

When navigating conflicting software architecture approaches, having a decision framework is like having a compass in a dense forest – it helps us find our way through the uncertainty. We establish criteria for evaluating each approach, such as feasibility, scalability, performance, and alignment with project goals. Then, we weigh the pros and cons of each approach against these criteria to make an informed decision. It's like putting each option on a scale and seeing which one tips in favor of our project's success. With a decision framework in place, we can confidently choose the best path forward and steer our project in the right direction.

Prototyping and testing are like trying on different outfits before a big event – you want to make sure everything looks good and feels right. In software development, it's about building small-scale versions of our ideas and putting them to the test. We create prototypes to see how different architecture approaches work in practice, identify any flaws or areas for improvement, and gather feedback from users and stakeholders. It's like taking our designs for a test drive to see how they handle real-world scenarios. By prototyping and testing, we can iterate quickly, refine our approaches, and ultimately build a stronger foundation for our project.

Seek Compromise: Look for areas of compromise where both approaches can be integrated or modified to accommodate each other. This might involve finding a middle ground or adopting a hybrid solution. Involve Stakeholders: If necessary, involve stakeholders such as project managers, product owners, and clients to provide their perspectives and help make informed decisions. Technical Proof-of-Concept: If feasible, create proof-of-concept implementations for each approach to evaluate their practicality and effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Implementing gradually is like building a house brick by brick – you start with a solid foundation and gradually add more layers until it's complete. In software development, it's about breaking down big changes into smaller, manageable steps. We implement one aspect of the architecture at a time, testing each component thoroughly before moving on to the next. This approach allows us to catch any issues early on, adapt to feedback along the way, and ensure a smoother transition for everyone involved. It's like taking the project one step at a time, making steady progress towards our ultimate goal.