What are the most relevant and reliable sources of data and information for resilience indicators?

Resilience indicators rely on diverse and credible data sources. Government databases, such as census records and economic surveys, provide foundational statistics, while global reports from organizations like the UN, World Bank, and OECD offer standardized benchmarks. Academic research and peer-reviewed studies add depth with evidence-based approaches. Real-time data from IoT sensors, GIS mapping, and satellite imagery support dynamic and environmental assessments. Additionally, community-based surveys and participatory research ensure localized and inclusive insights for effective resilience planning. Combining these sources creates a robust framework for measuring and enhancing resilience.

My suggestion would be to focus on reliable UN data sources for resilience indicators that include: UNDRR, with the Sendai Framework Monitor tracking disaster risk reduction; UNDP, offering resilience metrics through the Human Development Index and Resilience Portal; FAO, providing the Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis (RIMA) for food system vulnerabilities; UNEP, with ecosystem health and climate adaptation data via UNEP Live; and UNSD, managing the Global SDG Indicator Database for resilience-related targets. These sources combine global benchmarks with actionable insights.

When evaluating resilience indicators, the most relevant and reliable data sources include government agencies, such as census bureaus & disaster management authorities, which provide accurate demographic and hazard-specific data. International organizations like the UN & World Bank offer global resilience frameworks and datasets. Academic journals and research institutions contribute peer-reviewed studies on resilience metrics. Community-based organizations supply local insights, while private sector analytics firms provide advanced geospatial and climate modeling data. Open-source platforms like OpenStreetMap and Global Disaster Alert systems further enrich datasets ensuring comprehensive and actionable insights for resilience assessment.

To get data on resilience indicators in real-time or near-real-time, you should think about using new technology and approaches including crowdsourcing platforms, satellite photography, and remote sensing. As an example, crowdsourcing systems may include local populations in data collecting and monitoring activities, while satellite photography can offer useful insights into environmental changes and disaster consequences. Improvements in the timeliness, accuracy, and granularity of resilience data may be achieved through the adoption of novel methodologies. This will enable better decision-making and action at different levels.

When selecting data sources for resilience indicators, it’s essential to consider several key criteria to ensure the data is both useful and actionable. First, the scope and scale of the data must align with the system or context you are assessing—whether it's a community, region, or sector. The data should accurately reflect the resilience dimensions you’re measuring, such as environmental, social, or economic resilience. Next, data quality and reliability are paramount. The source must be consistent, accurate, and up-to-date, providing a solid foundation for analysis. It's also crucial to assess accessibility and usability—is the data easy to access, understand, and apply in real-world scenarios?

For upto the minute insights on community sentiment, behaviour patterns, and environmental conditions, I recommend exploring unusual data streams such as social media analytics, sentiment analysis, and IoT devices. Qualitative data on public attitude during and after catastrophes may be found, for example, by analysing trends on Twitter or Facebook. Weather sensors and water quality monitors are examples of IoT devices that may provide continuous monitoring of environmental data that are important for resilience planning. In order to improve their decision-making and understand resilience dynamics better, organizations can use these new data sources.

Various data sources are valuable for resilience indicators, tailored to your needs and objectives. The Resilience Atlas offers spatial data and analyses on social, ecological, and economic resilience across regions and scales. The Global Resilience Partnership provides tools and resources to enhance resilience in vulnerable areas. The World Bank publishes comprehensive datasets on poverty, governance, health, and more. Additionally, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) framework aids in measuring and monitoring resilience across diverse dimensions.

Reliable sources for resilience indicators include the UN SDG Tracker, World Bank Data, and OECD Indicators for global metrics. Climate-specific data can be accessed from the IPCC Reports and NASA Earth Data. Platforms like the Global Resilience Partnership provide actionable tools, while local databases like the EEA offer regional insights. These sources ensure accurate, actionable information for sustainable development goals and resilience planning.

Climate Data: 1. NASA Earth Observatory or NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) 2. World Bank Climate Data Socio-Economic Data: 3. World Bank and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Disaster Response and Recovery Data: 4. ReliefWeb 5. EM-DAT (Emergency Events Database) Environmental and Ecosystem Data: 6. Global Forest Watch 7. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) Health Data: 8. WHO (World Health Organization) 9. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Community and Social Resilience: 10. UNDP Financial Resilience Data: 11. IMF (International Monetary Fund) 12. World Bank India Specific 1. NRSC 2. IMD 3. MOSPI 4. ISRO 5. NDMA 6. CSE 7. NITI Aayog 8. ICAR 9. NHM 10. NFHS 11. NABARD 12. PMJDY

Resilience data sources such as global risk reports, climate data (NASA, IPCC), social-economic data (World Bank, OECD), and ESG platforms (Bloomberg, MSCI) offer insights for benchmarking, identifying key drivers, and prioritizing actions. Data helps track outcomes, adapt strategies, and communicate resilience progress to stakeholders. By comparing performance with peers, assessing vulnerabilities, and focusing on areas needing attention, resilience efforts can be effectively targeted. Practical applications include corporate sustainability, urban resilience, and supply chain risk management, ensuring systems remain adaptable and robust against disruptions.

After selecting data sources aligned with your resilience objectives, you can leverage them for various purposes. Benchmark your system against others or established standards to gain comparative insights. Identify key drivers and factors influencing resilience to prioritize areas for action or investment. Use the data to track and evaluate intervention outcomes, learning from successes and failures to refine strategies. Lastly, share resilience achievements and challenges with stakeholders to build understanding, solicit feedback, and foster collaborative support.

Reliable data sources are the backbone of resilience planning. Take the UNDRR and GFDRR—these organisations offer global benchmarks on disaster readiness, helping communities and nations compare resilience levels. Meanwhile, ND-GAIN ranks countries’ climate resilience, showing where investment is needed most, and OECD’s RMI quantifies resilience in public policy, essential for policy-led initiatives. Using these tools, decision-makers can identify key resilience drivers, track impacts, and adapt strategies based on real-time results. Sharing these insights builds support from stakeholders, creating a shared vision and approach to resilience. Data, after all, transforms challenges into actionable insights.

To gather reliable data on resilience indicators, utilize diverse sources such as government agencies (e.g., national statistical offices, FEMA), UN programs (e.g., UNDRR, UNDP), international bodies like the World Bank and WHO, and research institutions (e.g., Stockholm Resilience Centre). NGOs (e.g., Resilient Cities Network, Oxfam) and databases (e.g., EM-DAT, INFORM Index) offer insights into socio-economic, environmental, and disaster resilience. Open data platforms like World Bank Open Data and Copernicus, alongside corporate reports from GRI and CDP, provide comprehensive data for assessing adaptive capacities and vulnerabilities across sectors.

Qualitative Data: There is uncertainty when dealing with certain sensitive resilience matters such as 'not all voices being heard or captured', e.g. remote native communities may not be heard when dealing with deforestation. Quantitate Data: Naturally the reliability of all underpinning assumptions behind the data would need special considerations, normalization and possible weightings applied.