You're debating user access levels with colleagues in network security. How do you find common ground?
Navigating network security debates? Share your strategies for reaching consensus on user access levels.
You're debating user access levels with colleagues in network security. How do you find common ground?
Navigating network security debates? Share your strategies for reaching consensus on user access levels.
-
To find common ground in debating user access levels, I focus on aligning with security principles and operational needs. I emphasize the principle of least privilege, ensuring users have access only to what's necessary for their role. I propose defining access levels based on job functions and conducting regular reviews to adapt to changing needs. By discussing potential risks and ensuring access decisions are data-driven, I aim to balance security with productivity. This collaborative, evidence-based approach ensures a fair compromise and aligns with our organization's security goals.
-
If you are a true technologist, this challenge is an everyday affair. I followed following approach in many, but not only in one enterprise. 1. In ideal circumstances, (a) Enterprise would have access levels granted on the RBAC (Network or Application). (b) Network Security Policy aligned with Infrastructure, etc (c) RACI, etc 2. However, the above is not true everywhere; hence, follow the approach (a) Work with counterparts to be pragmatic (b) give the rationale and give the user access if it's imp to achieve the objective (c) when you do that, make sure security logging and monitoring is aligned and access is granted time-bound. (d) have alerting enabled for elevated privileges(e) revisit the decision after the stipulated time?
-
To find common ground in a debate about user access levels in network security, focus on shared goals: security, efficiency, and minimizing risks. Emphasize the principle of least privilege, which ensures users have only the access they need. Encourage collaboration by identifying where stricter controls and flexibility can coexist, such as using role-based access control (RBAC) and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to enhance both security and user experience. Finally, discuss potential trade-offs openly to balance security needs with operational requirements.
-
I guess you'd need to determine what those User Access Levels should be based on their job function. Firstly, ensure that Job Functions are clearly defined within your company/entity. Once you have ALL the job functions defined, then apply access levels based on that criteria. If someone indicates that they require access levels, then that may indicate a Job Function that was not defined and needs to be updated? Cheers, Chilli! 🌶
-
Robust RBAC: Both network and application resources are subject to a clear and strictly enforced (RBAC) system. Aligned Security Policies: A layered defense is ensured by network security policies that are in line with application and infrastructure requirements. Roles and responsibilities for security and access management are outlined in a clear RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Technological InnovationHow can you test new technology for man-in-the-middle attacks?
-
CybersecurityHow do you test your network's vulnerability?
-
Network SecurityHow can you use honeypots to trap hackers in a simulated network?
-
IT Security OperationsWhat are some of the best practices for creating and sharing security indicators of compromise (IOCs)?