Clarigent Health

🌟 **Get Immediate Mental Health Support, Anytime, Anywhere!** 🌟   In just five minutes, assess your or a loved one’s levels of depression, anxiety, and suicide risk with our quick, confidential tool, Clairity. You’ll be immediately connected with a mental health professional for a 45-60 minute session to review your results and get personalized recommendations for mental health care. Available 24/7 with no appointments or waiting—everything from the comfort of your home. Available for ages 18+ at https://lnkd.in/gJ3Ecrbs   See a testimonial from our friend, Kevin Hines, Survivor, Storyteller, Film Maker: "Before I attempted to take my life at the Golden Gate Bridge, I had been self-harming, but I had not yet named my suicidal intention. If Clairity had been used with my psychiatrist maybe my nascent suicidal thinking would have been identified sooner." #MentalHealth #InstantSupport #WellnessFromHome

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a widely used tool for assessing suicidal ideation and behavior. However, like any clinical tool, it has limitations and does not work effectively in all situations or with all individuals. It was NEVER intended to be used as a clinical tool but was instead created to be used in clinical trials to document participants that may be suicidal. The C-SSRS has been shown in peer reviewed journals to at best be accurate 50% of the time when used by a suicide prevention trained mental health professional. 1. Interviewer Skill and Training: The effectiveness of the C-SSRS depends heavily on the skill and training of the person administering it. Inadequate training or experience leads to inaccurate assessments. 2. Patient Honesty and Willingness to Disclose: The accuracy of the C-SSRS relies on the honesty and openness of the individual being assessed. If a person is not willing to disclose their true feelings or behaviors, the results will not be accurate. 3. Cultural and Language Barriers: Cultural differences and language barriers can affect the understanding and interpretation of the questions, leading to inaccurate assessments. 4. Variability in Interpretation: Different clinicians interpret responses differently, leading to variability in the assessment outcomes. 5. Complexity of Suicidal Behavior: Suicidal ideation and behavior are complex and multifaceted. A standardized tool like the C-SSRS does not capture all the nuances of an individual’s mental state and risk factors. 6. Lack of Follow-Up: The C-SSRS is a point-in-time assessment. Without adequate follow-up, changes in a person's mental state will not be detected, leading to missed opportunities for intervention. 7. Context-Specific Limitations: The C-SSRS is not suitable for all settings or populations. For instance, it is not as effective in non-clinical settings or with individuals who have certain cognitive impairments. We must stop using antiquated tools that have been used only because "we don't have anything better" and start using technology to provide the information necessary to inform professionals and help them to stop the growing tragedy of suicide in our society. Visit Clarigent Health (https://lnkd.in/gKm_9bkJ) to see how we can do better together. #mentalhealth #mentalhealthawareness #mentalhealthmatters #suicideprevention #depression #anxiety #suicide #suicideawarness #ptsd #mentalillness #suicideawareness #endthestigma #youarenotalone #trauma #mentalhealthrecovery https://lnkd.in/gjSRitxk

This is a bipartisan issue. It’s an everyone issue. It’s a 5 in 5 issue. Forget whether you love/like this surgeon general or administration or not…we need more and more folks in leadership positions like this, sounding the alarm bells on all the things that are impacting mental health in this country (and this world). In 1965, after the previous year’s landmark report from Surgeon General Luther L. Terry that linked cigarette smoking to lung cancer and heart disease, Congress mandated unprecedented warning labels on packs of cigarettes, the first of which stated, “Caution: Cigarette Smoking May Be Hazardous to Your Health.” The same is needed for social media - a warning label. Will that label stem the tides? No. Will it change behaviors massively - probably not. But, it starts to grease the wheels the way these tobacco labels did. Eventually those labels turned into things like “The Truth” campaigns, that ultimately convinced folks how harmful tobacco was to their health - thru education…the only true way behaviors change. There is no way we can deny that since the advent & popularization of social media, there has been an uptick in suicides & overdoses. According to a 2019 study by the American Psycholgical Association: "The proportion of young adults with suicidal thoughts or other suicide related outcomes increased 47%from 2008 to 2017, when social media use among that age group soared." The comparisons, the constant refreshing & doom scrolling, the race for likes & follows. The human brain lived for many thousands of years (and maybe more) without this constant depleting of dopamine through these channels, all day - every day. Go on any public transportation & heads are buried in phones & if you’re sitting next to someone & glance across it’s almost always social media. We “people watch”…it’s what we do as humans. But now in the palm of our hands, w unlimited scrolls, that people watching has taken over & the data shows, it’s not been healthy. I’m not a labels person. Some of what gets diagnosed is so subjective. Suicide & overdose are not…& they’ve both increased significantly since the advent of social media. We need moves like this - warnings, that lead to campaigns, that lead to changes in behavior through education. These are important steps I hope we all can get behind. #SameHere🤙 #5in5 #BeHereTomorrow #socialmediadetox #warnings #surgeongeneral

Today is my son Justin’s 33rd birthday. As many of you know we lost Justin to #suicide in 2017. Justin was just starting his life. I remember him as an amazing young man with a brilliant wit and infectious smile. He was my best friend and I miss him every day. I could bore you with hours of stories about him, but he would hate that; he would prefer this. For those who have lost someone remember that there is no right or wrong way to grieve or remember your loved one. Do what feels right for you and what brings you comfort. If you find it difficult to cope, seeking support from a therapist or counselor who specializes in grief can be extremely helpful. I am developing a document that I am using to advance a series of articles and podcasts expanding on these mental health and suicide prevention topics. What we have decided to do at Clarigent Health is to save those who can still be saved. Today I want to talk briefly about technology and resistance to change. Too many MHPs are content with the status quo. At best, current scales are correct 50% of the time. In the era of rapid technological advancement, it is paradoxical that mental health care has not capitalized on the potential of modern technology. While there have been minor strides in integrating digital tools into mental health services, significant gaps remain. The mental health sector is resistant to change. Clinicians, institutions, & state and county agencies reliant on traditional methods & funding are hesitant to adopt modern technologies. This can stem from a lack of familiarity with digital tools, concerns about efficacy, or fears about the potential for technology to replace human interaction. Throwing money at the same programs that are not working and continuing to use outdated scales, screenings, and treatments that have been shown to not work needs to stop, now. A change in thinking must happen. While it is exciting to see government agencies starting to fund more mental health programs and especially suicide prevention, this tends to simply push funds into the same programs that are not working. This not only does not work to solve the problem, but it is also a pointless waste of money when there are other diagnostics and treatments that could be making a difference right now. The lack of technology in mental health care represents a significant missed opportunity to enhance services and improve outcomes. Addressing this gap requires concerted efforts to increase funding, overcome resistance to change, ensure data privacy and ethical standards, bridge the digital divide, and invest in targeted research and development. By embracing technology, the mental health sector can unlock new possibilities for accessibility, early intervention, personalized care, and overall effectiveness. The integration of digital tools into mental health care is not just an innovation - it is imperative for meeting the needs of a modern, diverse, and connected society. #suicideprevention