Law Forward reposted this
The Wisconsin Supreme Court election is not the only statewide matter on the April 1 ballot. We’re also voting for the Superintendent of Public Instruction and on a proposed constitutional amendment. The proposed amendment would add a voter ID requirement to our state constitution. Law Forward joined a broad coalition of democracy organizations urging Wisconsinites to reject this proposed change: https://lnkd.in/gS3TQHYf Since Wisconsin first became a state, we have repeatedly expanded the right to vote. The initial state constitutional language said that only white men could vote, but it expressly allowed the franchise to be offered to others if a statewide referendum approved that change. In 1849, just one year after statehood, Wisconsinites passed a referendum allowing black men to vote. It took another 17 years—until Ezekial Gillespie pressed the issue and the Wisconsin Supreme Court said that the referendum vote was binding—for that change to be effective. Wisconsin was, famously, the first state to ratify the 19th Amendment, which expanded voting rights to women. Wisconsin is one of only a few states that has long allowed new voters to register and cast a ballot on election day. And Wisconsin has been a leader in expanding absentee voting. In 2011, Wisconsin adopted one of the nation’s most stringent voter ID laws. This was a solution in search of a nonexistent problem—there simply is no evidence of any significant voter fraud. And data shows that the voter ID law has stifled turnout for some segments of our population. Nonetheless, the law is broadly popular, and both state and federal courts have rejected those challenges brought against the law to date. But it still does not belong in our state constitution. The constitution is the charter of our state. It contains the foundation of our government, and it begins with the Declaration of Rights, which enumerates specific freedoms retained by the people. Unlike the federal constitution, our state constitution expressly addresses and protects the right to vote. And it leaves space—appropriately—for us to use our laws to fashion the administration of elections to meet the changing needs of our society across time. Enshrining in the constitution a limitation that blocks some eligible voters from exercising their rights is inconsistent with our Declaration of Rights. Even those who support Wisconsin’s voter ID law should vote against this amendment, which changes nothing about voter ID but demeans our constitution.