🎙 In the POIESIS project on trust in science, we recently concluded an expert interview study with 119 science communicators and researchers across seven European countries. The study examined how knowledge dissemination between research and citizens occurs, focusing on the complex ‘chains of mediation’ involved, and gathered recommendations to foster public trust in science.
🔎 In the Danish part of the study, we interviewed ten institutional and non-institutional science mediators and six researchers specializing in climate change and COVID-19. Both groups emphasized the importance of highlighting the positive value of science in communication efforts and involving citizens and stakeholders in research.
🌐 Interviews with mediators suggest that while a traditional mediation model persists, it does not adequately capture the complexity, realities, and multiple translation processes within the Danish science communication landscape. Overall, mediators do not position themselves firmly within a prescriptive chain of mediation and view public trust in science as central to their role. Though not identifying a general crisis of trust, they cite concerns around disinformation and conflicting science narratives in media.
👩🎓 Researchers identified that public concerns arise when research is presented in conflicting ways or challenges personal beliefs, creating uncertainty around its credibility. Several researchers noted that ambiguity in research knowledge and in the role and objectivity of experts can both diminish and increase the polarization of public perceptions. While generally supportive of citizen involvement, some questioned whether it necessarily increases public trust in science. Generally, researchers emphasize the significant role that media and politicians play in science representation, consequently affecting public trust in science.
❗ For a comprehensive overview of the research findings and recommendations, please see the Danish and global report at https://lnkd.in/e73ziz8B.
#EUproject #Education #Research #TrustInScience #EnhancingTrust #POIESIS