Andy Harris’ Post

https://stealthwriter.ai/ Stealthwriter rewrites AI content into human-like text. Guaranteed plagiarism-free & undetectable by AI detectors

Last time I see even more posts a-la "Don't use AI for content creation, it is bad!" But the real problem isn’t AI. It’s how people use (or misuse) it. Blaming AI for bad content is like blaming a hammer for a poorly built birdhouse. It’s not the tool that’s the issue — it’s the user’s approach. I decomposed the most common complaints about AI and, spoiler alert, why they say more about us than the technology itself. Buckle up; this is going to get real.

What concerns me most is that AI devs are attempting to solve a problem that simply doesn't exist. More content?! In fact, the opposite problem exists. We already have more content than we can possibly consume in a lifetime. Instead of generating media, it would be wonderful to see further development around AI search and dissemination of existing content. Now that would solve a GENUINE PROBLEM. A writer doesn't need an AI to draft their story. They need an AI to tidy their research files, market their work and do their taxes!

How would you feel if we could tell with 100% accuracy whether any content on the internet had been generated by AI? At the AI Meetup last week in Bali we talked about Google's recent announcement about open-sourcing their AI watermarking technology for Gemini. (Link to story in the comments below) While watermarking aims to distinguish AI-generated text from human-written content, its effectiveness remains questionable. The technique involves subtly adjusting token probability scores so they create a unique code without affecting output quality. However, this approach has inherent weaknesses: 1. Edited AI text can lose its watermark 2. Syntax changers could potentially remove watermarks 3. The creation of 'anti-watermarking' tools seems inevitable The ethical implications are also complex. Should AI-assisted content always be labeled? What about partially AI-generated work? I don't think watermarking will ever catch on and I think we're just entering an endless cat-and-mouse game of watermarking and circumvention. What's your take on AI watermarking? Is it a necessary step towards responsible AI use, or a well-intentioned but ultimately futile effort?

The problem with AI content isn't that you used AI. It's that you took the output, looked it over, and thought: "Yeah, this is totally fine to represent me in public!" I read lame AI posts on the timeline nonstop and usually have two questions: 1. Is this person approving these or does a VA just send them through? 2. Why do these folks not READ the posts and give them a quick edit? Truth is, my team and I use AI all the time. It's a great tool and we've spent a lot of time making sure we can use it at the highest level for our content writing service. But we NEVER IN A ZILLION YEARS would ship out the first thing Claude or GPT spits back at us. Insane behavior. Use AI, but don't just slam whatever it writes into your timeline. You'll burn a ton of leads and make yourself look very silly in the process.

You’ve seen the meme: I don’t need AI to do my job; I need it to do my laundry. Lead Content Writer Samantha Drake agrees. Here are some takeaways from her blog post on AI-enabled tools “Is Generative AI A Tool Or Replacement For Writers? A Writer’s Take.” Use cautiously, generative AI tools could be valuable time-savers for writers But AI-generated content is notoriously inaccurate, unreliable and limited  New AI technology is generating legal issues that may not be resolved any time soon. What matters most to clients is high-quality, trust-worthy writing that meets their needs. Even if AI could somehow do our laundry, we’d double-check that too! You can read the full post here: https://lnkd.in/eqFtBTKn And, in case you missed it, you can read about my most recent (hilarious and frustrating) experience using Zoom’s AI Companion here: https://lnkd.in/e3iVjqGD

Many organisations now prefer human-written content instead of AI. And that’s great! The problem here? AI-detector tools. Clients insist on running everything through these tools and expect a 0% result - nothing more and nothing less. The catch is, these tools are obviously not accurate and end up labelling most complex sentences and formal tones as AI even if they were 100% human-generated. So, to counter that, you’ve now got AI Humanizer tools. You can run your “AI-generated content” (decided by AI) through this humanizer to make it look like a human wrote it (written by AI, again). Basically, you can now make human-written content look more human (by AI standards, pls) with the help of AI. What a time to be alive (and human)?! 😌

Uncover the truth with CTFC: our Gen AI tool scrutinises content for factual accuracy. Say goodbye to misinformation! https://lnkd.in/eKGa9ScM

"Don’t rely on AI, but don’t ignore it either. Make your writing better but keep your message clear and interesting without obvious AI signs." ~ Jodie Cook The challenge with AI-generated content lies in its tendency to be verbose and lack clarity. While AI can produce coherent text, it often requires rigorous editing to distill the message and make it concise. This is something a lot of people struggle with. The key is to strike a balance between harnessing AI's strengths and refining its output to ensure your unique voice and message shine through. However you feel about AI generated content, LLMs are here to stay and will continue to influence how written contents are created. https://lnkd.in/dgcPsMkZ

Your #AI-generated content doesn’t have to sound like a robot. Here are some tips that will help you humanize AI content: https://lnkd.in/grGZGp8c