Activate’s Post

What if marketing technology wasn’t about ownership but about outcome? “Service-as-a-Software” is quickly evolving from buzzword to strategy. In the next few years, agencies could offer more than just expertise—they’ll deliver the tools, platforms, and dashboards you need to drive autonomous, data-fueled decision-making. Enter GTM Tech Stacks: campaign-specific technologies seamlessly integrated into your existing systems. This shift means no more expensive investments or resource-heavy implementations. But the trade-off? You’re relying on the agency for those tools, creating a potential dependency. Is full control over your tech stack a non-negotiable, or are you ready to embrace a new, more efficient model? Agustín Rejón| Martechbase | Velocity Partners |#Martech #GTMStack #B2BMarketing #TechStack #DataDriven #MarketingAutomation #DigitalTransformation #Activate_ms

View profile for Agustín Rejón, graphic

GTM Strategy & MarTech at Velocity Partners | Founder martechbase.com

𝗪𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲? “Service-as-a-Software” is becoming more than a trendy concept for in-house teams and agencies. The prediction is that, in the next 3-5 years, marketing services could become more ‘software-like.’ Agencies wouldn’t just offer strategic support. They’d provide clients with platforms, dashboards, and tools to enable more autonomous, data-driven decision-making. The idea of 𝗚𝗧𝗠 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀 fits right into this vision. It also clicks with some of the stack composability trends Phil Gamache has been exploring on Humans of Martech, which I’ve been keeping an eye on. Here’s the gist: ⤷ Instead of asking clients to invest in new platforms, agencies provide campaign-specific technology as part of their service fees. ⤷ These tools, selected based on the client’s needs, plug right into their existing stack, removing the hassle of adoption or management, especially for apps used exclusively for campaigns, testing hypotheses, or achieving quick wins. ⤷ The focus shifts to what really matters: deliver the outcome, without getting bogged down by the tools, processes, or ownership details behind it. ✅ Pros: Clients get immediate access to the right tools without the hassle of implementation, training or long-term investment (this can always be done at a later stage if needed). ❌ Cons: Obviously clients become more dependent on the agency, with a potential transition needed for these tools if the relationship ends. 𝗜𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗼𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗮 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗻𝗲𝗴𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂?

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics