Adam Dixon’s Post

View profile for Adam Dixon, graphic

Vice President of Engineering @ RIVANNA | PhD, Medical Imaging

Absolute and relative contraindications are central to procedural decision-making in neuraxial anesthesia. But here’s the question: Are they as fixed as they seem? 🛑 Absolute contraindications (e.g., coagulopathy, patient refusal, or localized infection) are traditionally non-negotiable and foundational to patient safety, yet advancing medical technologies and techniques are slowly redefining what’s possible. For instance, enhanced imaging tools and multidisciplinary planning could mitigate risks in once-deemed “absolute” cases. ⚠️ Relative contraindications (e.g., spinal deformities, prior surgeries, or hypovolemia) depend heavily on clinical judgment. This raises important considerations: How can tools and training further support clinicians in navigating these nuanced cases? How can we make relative contraindications safer to manage? It’s time to rethink the evolving understanding of contraindications and explore opportunities for innovation. Progress in this field won’t just push boundaries — it could change lives. #Anesthesia #Innovation #Anesthesiology What do you think? Are absolute contraindications immovable barriers, or is there room for advancement? 💬Comment with your ideas and 🔁repost to help us keep the conversation going.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics