The IOC is always going on about how they do everything in the interests of the athletes. But is this shambles around the triathlon at the Paris Games really about the athletes? Yes, in terms of protecting their health today. But why was this decision to have the swimming in the Seine taken in the first place with what seems to be no backstop? It is more about promoting Paris than about triathlon. It was always risky. Interestingly, World Aquatics have the backstop of their open water swimming race in the rowing lake if the Seine is too dirty for their race later. But it doesn't work for triathlon, it seems. So now there is talk about having a duathlon rather than a triathlon. Now, people do compete in such races, but would we settle for a five-a-side kickabout in place of the World Cup final? No. It ain't the same. I hope the Olympic reporters are asking tough questions now of both Paris organisers and the IOC. They need to. The athletes have been let down if these races don't take place properly. https://lnkd.in/eATvvWgF
Totally agree with this. There are so many places that could have provided an amazing back drop for the Tri. I know this comment was probably only meant tongue in cheek, but I don’t quite agree with is your duathlon five-a-side ‘kick about’ analogy. As someone who competes in her age group for Team GB, duathlon is a huge challenge, mentally and physically gruelling, and certainly not a kick about. No hard feelings from my side: I’d welcome it in the Olympics though!
Agreed. What about those athletes that excel at the swimming leg? So unfair after years of training. It should hardly be a surprise that the water is not clean enough.
Senior Lecturer and Course leader in Multimedia Sports Journalism at University of Northampton, Freelance Writer and Broadcaster, Media Training Consultant
4moWell, they seem to have got the men's and women's individual events done today which is great. I will leave it a few days before final analysis of the whole thing completed.