Age Verification Providers Association’s Post

We often hear critics of age assurance requirements argue they are pointless because children can simply use a virtual private network (#VPN) to evade them by pretending to be in a jurisdiction that does not require age checks. This is a fallacy. There are no laws we have found in any state or country globally that exempt websites from age verification requirements if a user applies a VPN.     1.        Legal responsibility remains with the website: Websites or apps providing age-restricted content or services are legally obligated to ensure compliance with age verification laws to users physically located within jurisdictions where they are in force, regardless of whether users attempt to bypass these measures using a VPN.     2.        VPNs do not nullify regulations: The application of a VPN by a user does not absolve the website from its duty to verify the age of users accessing its services. Legal frameworks, such as those in the UK’s Online Safety Bill or other regulatory environments, place responsibility on websites to implement robust age verification systems, irrespective of user behaviour. Some regulators such as the Coimisiún na Meán in Ireland, also require sites to prohibit the use of VPNs or other circumvention techniques     3.        No legal exemption for users or websites: A VPN may obscure a user’s location or IP address, but it does not create a loophole in the law. Websites must maintain compliance, and users attempting to circumvent these measures may still face consequences under the site’s terms or applicable laws. "But the child used a VPN to access harmful content, your honor" is not a defense.     4.        Compliance systems are designed to detect dircumvention: Many modern platforms and some age assurance systems are designed to address circumvention attempts, including identifying patterns consistent with VPN use. Netflix, the BBC and ESPN have been doing this for years. So while some adult websites may have seen the chance to promote sales of VPNs when they apply blocks to certain geographies, that is motivated by the commission they earn, not sound legal advice. Information Commissioner's Office Ofcom Ken Paxton California Privacy Protection Agency Utah Department of Commerce Ashley Moody Todd Rokita Letitia James Office of the New York State Attorney General

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics