AgMarket.Net®’s Post

So, what happens when the accident insurer wants to examine the insured’s body… and there’s no body? A 11th Circuit panel looked at how ERISA affects that. https://lnkd.in/eYMU4hak #erisa #mountainclimbing

🚀 Achieve Financial Freedom Faster® with a well-connected cash flow structure. My clients using Currence are saving 6X higher than the national average! Currence is not just a product; it's a revolutionary cash flow structure that focuses on the core of financial planning. Most financial companies offer old products as new ones, driven by commissions. Currence is a game-changer in financial advisory work, making it the largest upgrade in decades. Message me to learn more about Currence https://lnkd.in/eExHAd9c #FinancialFreedom #Currence #CashFlow #FinancialPlanning

Testimony from a client who buys Darsfarm products Please listen

Threat of Trial Leads to Bigger Wins | Tip of the Day 10/7/24 The tip of the day for October 7th, 2024, comes from Nicholas Rowley & Courtney Rowley's book "Running with the Bulls: How to Win Top Dollar Settlements", available on demand: https://lnkd.in/giZ5Zz3v “When insurers believe you are willing to go to trial–even on very tough cases–they will offer more money on the next case because the risk of you going to trial, and therefore the risk to the insurer of a large judgment, has increased." #trialguides #tipoftheday #quoteoftheday #NickRowley #CourtneyRowley #legaleducation #legalknowledge #trialstrategy #trialtips

After years in run-off, Arrowood Indemnity Company has entered liquidation, and policyholders now have only until January 15, 2025 to submit their proof of claims forms, reserving funds for valuable policies that could be permanently forfeited if not submitted in time. Here is KCIC Managing Director Nick Sochurek explaining important background on the situation and how KCIC can support policyholders in our new video blog. 

Testimony from a client who buys Darsfarm products Please listen

Today, in Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, the Ohio Supreme Court held that "[b]ecause Sherwin-Williams's payment to the abatement fund was not to compensate for past harm but, rather, to eliminate future harm, the payment was not damages under the contracts." As the Court's synopsis notes, "Insurers of paint company that marketed and sold lead paint are not obligated to indemnify paint company for payments that paint company made into abatement fund to mitigate hazards of lead paint--Because abatement-fund payment was made to prevent future harm rather than compensate for past harm, payment was not 'damages' covered under insurance contracts." This related to the underlying Santa Clara County lead paint public nuisance action. Public nuisance claims and abatement funds are hot topics these days.

Interesting ruling. Always important to consider what a settlement is paying for.

It’s lined up to be an interesting discussion! Alycen Moss and Stephen Pate of Cozen O'Connor will present the webinar titled "Top Property Cases of 2023."

Our track record speaks volumes! 💰 We’ve recovered millions for our clients. See how. #PersonalInjuryLawyer #PersonalInjuryLaw #PersonalInjury #CharlesInjuryLaw #FloridaLaw #FloridaLawyer #RecoveredMillions #SuccessStories