Alberta Prosperity Project’s Post

Edwin Vieira, Jr., JD, PhD, critiques the Biden-Harris administration, discussing the legal hurdles facing Donald Trump and the potential interference of the "deep state" in his presidency. He explores Biden’s foreign policy inconsistencies, the constitutional concerns surrounding Trump’s cabinet, and the broader inefficiencies in government operations. Vieira argues that many government agencies do not merely need to run more efficiently, but should be eliminated altogether due to their unconstitutional nature and overreach. He also addresses the Federal Reserve’s economic influence, the possibility of military involvement in immigration enforcement, and the need for greater integrity within the justice system. Ultimately, Vieira calls for a more accountable and transparent government that respects constitutional limits and prioritizes public understanding of government functions. YouTube: https://lnkd.in/geT4dcr4 Rumble: https://lnkd.in/gcxw4hec Soundcloud: https://lnkd.in/gSuJUKn7

Pierre Pollievre is being heavily criticized for not wanting to be bound by the constraints of secrecy. It’s hard to say you’re trustworthy if you’re bound to secrecy about certain subjects. Openness and transparency forms the foundation of trust. It begs the question as to whether there is any reason that secrecy within the operation of government should be permitted. If the people of Canada hold the power to elect officials to act on their behalf, why would the privilege of secrecy be inferred upon elected officials. They are subject to work for and on the behalf of citizens and that requires transparency and accountability. Is secrecy a symptom of what is wrong with our system and in the name of freedom of speech should we not insist that it should never be extended as a political privilege? If we the people have the power to elect, we should also be afforded the privilege of of accountability.

A short post detailing just a few of the public failures, corruption and treasonous acts of the trudeau liberals over the last week. You would need a much much larger post to document all of trudeau’s failures, lies, criminal activity, corruption and acts against Canadians, the constitution and Canadian democracy over the tenure of his incompetent and anti-Canadian term in office. https://lnkd.in/gfAycF52

Anthony Albanese I'm aware you are part of the dominant socialist left faction of your Australian Labor Party government, but Australia is a democracy and the majority of mainstream Australians do not share your ideology. Your government was elected with 32% of the primary vote, so less than one third of Australians voted for Labor. This does not give you a mandate to censor the social media accounts of Australians because you are sensitive about satirical memes created about you & your amateur cabinet and government. You chose to be a public figure and ridicule goes with the territory. You and your government create plenty of situations to be parodied. Why have you used your eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman - Grant to suppress the Assyrian Christian Bishop's stabbing when far worse violence is readily available to view on the Internet? The stabbing was a factual crime, it is definitely not misinformation or disinformation, so why are you conflating the incident in an attempt to get support for your Orwellian Ministry of Truth bill? Why hasn't the eSafety Commissioner taken action against the many Islamic hate preachers spewing antisemitic hate and untruthful tropes? (Actual mis/disinformation) They are stoking more division online and in the community than the presence of the footage of the Bishop's stabbing online. If your Misinformation/Disinformation bill was legislated, would my post, which includes my opinion and actual facts be censored because you dislike it or it goes against your political narrative and or agendas? You seem to think that being our PM allows you to tell Australians what to do, when to do it and how to think, rather than the fact that you serve at our whim. I hope this is made very apparent to you, your weak leadership on this & many other issues and your ideology sooner, rather than later.

This ongoing cycle of parliamentary failure, judicial overreach, and military intervention has rendered Parliament almost powerless in certain critical areas, leading to a government system where unelected individuals hold control and command over national affairs. In essence, this has led to the erosion of democracy, where the will of the people is consistently ignored, and the rule of law is bypassed in favor of authoritarian control. The blame lies squarely on parliamentarians who, through their negligence and self-interest, have allowed this power imbalance to persist for decades. https://lnkd.in/dMAuTTA2

This is concerning: A report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) reveals that some Canadian politicians are collaborating with foreign governments to advance their own interests, leading to potential illegal behavior. The report highlights instances of parliamentarians receiving support from foreign missions, accepting funds or benefits, providing privileged information to foreign officials, and improperly influencing Parliamentary colleagues. NSICOP cites concerns about the slow response by the Canadian government to threats from countries like China and India targeting Canada's democratic process with interference. The report recommends reforms to address foreign interference, including extending Elections Canada's jurisdiction and introducing amendments to Canadian law. The Trudeau government recently introduced legislation, Bill C-70, to address some of these recommendations.

The President of the United States of America should be reminded that (by the principle of separation of powers between executive and judicial) he should not interfere with the decisions of a court of justice; and that holding a court in contempt could be a serious offense. As far of the rest of the world is concerned, the International Criminal Court of Justice is of a 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘 to the Supreme Court of the US, for the matters that have been delegated to it. Whether the US legal system recognizes this situation or not, that's the way it is, is by force of facts and by force of powerful ideas. At the Nuremberg and Tokyo courts after WWII, the US representatives had made the point that a country does not need to have accepted formally the jurisdiction of an international court of justice, to be subjected to it. The principle is valid in the reverse, and there shall be no double standards: the US Federal Government is now bound respect the decisions of the International Criminal Court of the Hague it has itself wished into existence, by the precedents of Nuremberg and Tokyo. The world expects no less from the US: to practice the principles of legality and human rights it teaches in international relations, as well as to its own member states of the Union. If Mr. Biden wished to introduce a recourse, he would likely be able to do so. At the same time, he should treat the highest magistrates in the world in criminal matters, with the respect that is due to their rank.

New Post: Police investigate allegedly racist remarks by biggest donor to Britain’s Conservative government - https://lnkd.in/gnZZ4iez - Police say they are investigating whether the largest donor to Britain’s Conservative government committed a crime when he reportedly said a Black member of Parliament made him “want to hate all Black women” and that she “should be shot.” - #news #business #world -------------------------------------------------- Download: Stupid Simple CMS - https://lnkd.in/g4y9XFgR -------------------------------------------------- or download at SourceForge - https://lnkd.in/gNqB7dnp

All Texans pay a price for politicians who break the rules. We need to enforce higher ethical standards in government as we build a democracy that truly works for all of us, and we need to do it now. ⭐ Read the full @TexasTribune article here: https://lnkd.in/gBYgpFbR

📢🆕Early view❗️ How do parliaments gather, analyze, and use different sources of knowledge❓ As crucial sites where power in society is represented, debated, and distributed, Marc Geddes compares #evidence use in UK #HouseofCommons & German #Bundestag👇 https://lnkd.in/di6esPya