Andrew Zorn’s Post

View profile for Andrew Zorn, graphic

Drug Discovery | Innovation | Business Development & Strategy | Entrepreneurship

Even in early stage biotech there is power in numbers... When there was ample capital available it made sense for early stage biotech companies to stay largely closed off and forge the drug discovery valley of death on their own. There seemed to be endless capital to stay alive. VC was willing to take a lot of risky and even questionable bets. But regardless of that, the failure rate in biotech and particularly therapeutics has always been high. Tons of ideas getting funded with sky high valuations never changed that. So even as early stage capital returns to biotech, there is time to consider an inflection point. Early stage biotechs should think about more early stage collaboration or even combining of ideas. Sure, that means that you have doubled the number of founders and split the equity pie amongst more individuals. But this could be a way to de-risk. It could be a way to reach the clinic quicker or an exit quicker. I see a lot of good early stage ideas that could be made great if they spoke to other early stage ideas and considered joining forces. Sometimes 1 + 1 does equal 3. Power in numbers. Let's consider more collaboration between early stage biotechs. Consortium of early ventures? #Biotech #VentureCapital #Therapeutics #DrugDiscovery

Mark Duncan

Bioengineer Experienced in Leading Teams for Product and Process Dev

6mo

Fantastic point. Biotech is such a complex area that I think having a larger group of founders is very often the best way to have a solid foundation. And I definitely think there are situations where rolling up a couple early stage companies into one would make sense and increase the odds of success. Building up community and conversation between founders would be extremely helpful in identifying those cases and potentiating greater collaboration in our work.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics