Anne Genduso’s Post

Redefining Labor Laws in the Wake of Global Work From Home Day: Balancing Flexibility and Worker Protections Read More: https://lnkd.in/ej46zad6 As the workplace landscape shifts under the influence of a growing remote work culture, the celebration of Global Work From Home Day offers ...

In this interview Ed Cohen and I talk about the impact of work from home on organisations, the Great Resignation, the role of unions, and how companies will have to rethink work, beyond simply allowing some of their workforce to be remote. https://lnkd.in/d6pX8aW5

💼 The New York Times tech workers aren’t just striking for higher pay – they’re pushing for a fair contract and better work-life balance. Their demands include greater job protections and full-time remote work options. But Times leaders argue that tech union members are among the highest-paid employees in the company, with benefits that already set a high bar. 🏆 This standoff is a reminder of the changing nature of media work. As tech becomes more central to news production, so do tech workers’ voices. Should media companies be more responsive to these evolving demands?

US Labor Department adopts an anti-labor policy against remote work – The U.S. Department of Labor is under fire for its recent return-to-office mandate, requiring employees to be onsite at least five days per pay period by the end of 2024. – Labor unions argue the policy undermines collective bargaining, disrupts work-life balance, and disregards months of negotiations. – Data from the federal government itself contradicts this move, showing remote workers report higher engagement, retention, and performance compared to their in-office counterparts. – By enforcing rigid onsite work, the Labor Department risks alienating its workforce and undermining trust—while ignoring the benefits of flexibility. – Instead of embracing modern, evidence-based practices, this policy sends a mixed message: advocating for workers’ rights while failing to apply those same principles internally. – As organizations rethink the future of work, the Labor Department’s decision stands as a cautionary tale about clinging to outdated models at the expense of progress. Read more in my article for The Hill https://lnkd.in/gr_VkruZ

Flexible and hybrid working is in the news almost every day, with Amazon the latest company to announce a return to full-time in-office working and the government getting ready to announce its new Employment Rights Bill. Under the Bill, it's likely that #flexibleworking will become the default position for employees, which means many employers may need to look at their #hybrid and flexible working policies to ensure they are up to date. But flexible working is not something that works for every business - what is your policy? Let us help you make the best decision for your business. Visit GLU today where we provide expert support and guidance on hybrid and flexible working, and other #HR & #HealthandSafety changes your business needs to be prepared for. #GLUesday #elearning

As remote work continues to be prevalent among many industries, it is more important than ever for employers to understand and proactively address potential issues that may arise as a result of remote work policies. Be sure to join Andrew Zwerling and Lauren Levine for this insightful webinar on the legal implications associated with remote workers.

One of the many headline-grabbing elements of the Government's Employment Rights Bill was the one concerning flexible working. Regular readers of BusinessTime in Essex might know by now that flexible working is something of a hobby horse of mine. I'll be offering my humble thoughts on the subject in the forthcoming winter issue, but I'm keen to hear what others think - particularly when it comes to the productivity argument. My thinking is that if someone is less productive when working from home, it's as much the fault of management not managing as it is the practical issues of working flexibly. I'd love to hear from people - employees and employers - who have experienced flexible working. Has it worked for you - particularly from a productivity perspective - and, if not, why not? Do you think the Bill's proposals give too much power and too many rights to the employee or is the Bill a necessary means of overcoming employer intransigence when it comes to allowing flexible working. Welcome your thoughts!

In this interview Ed Cohen and I talk about the impact of work from home on organisations, the Great Resignation, the role of unions, and how companies will have to rethink work, beyond simply allowing some of their workforce to be remote. https://lnkd.in/dxbR_SJp

The Employment Rights Bill: Increased Number of roles offering WFH The introduction of the Employment Rights Bill, granting employees the right to request flexible working from day one, is shaping up to be a game-changer for the workplace. Recent data indicates a shift, with an increase in remote job postings following the Bill's announcement in October. This marks a reversal of the downward trend seen throughout the year, highlighting how this legislation is influencing businesses to reconsider their stance on flexible working. Read the fill article by following this link:- https://lnkd.in/eZuZ4hxD Caroline Kingsley M: 07768 381 831 E: caroline@kingsleyrecruitment.co.uk #workfromhome #homeworking #recruitment

With the post-pandemic uptake in hybrid working, the boundaries between home and work life have become increasingly blurred. Labour's have promised to introduce a right for employees to disconnect and to strengthen employee protections from surveillance. You can read more about what these proposals mean for employers and individuals alike on the Tees website here: https://lnkd.in/ekMYq4tS