There is a common belief that a teacher’s professional growth plateaus after the first few years of teaching. Research by Rice (2003), Hanushek and Luque (2003), and Rockoff (2004) support this, suggesting a steep learning curve in the first three to five years, followed by a leveling off. However, resent research challenges this view. A review by Podolsky et al. (2019) indicates that teacher effectiveness can continue to improve throughout a career. Supporting ongoing teacher development is crucial. Effective CPD positively impacts teacher performance and student outcomes. Policymakers, researchers, and school leaders must ensure all teachers have access to high-quality CPD, regardless of their level of experience. In summary, while teacher development may slow after the initial years, it does not stop. Continuous professional growth is possible and should be a priority for the education sector. For more information on how an effective CPD looks like, I would recommend everyone to read the research published by Education Endowment Foundation:
"This post challenges a long-held belief about teacher development and offers valuable insights. It's crucial to recognize that teacher growth is a lifelong journey, not a sprint. Investing in ongoing, high-quality CPD for all educators is essential for improving student outcomes. Let's shift the narrative and prioritize professional growth at every stage of a teacher's career. I'll definitely check out the Education Endowment Foundation's research for practical guidance."
National Education Officer for The Battlefields Trust and Experienced School Principal
3moThis makes sense but the issue is surely not capacity to improve but priorities. In the first few years, teachers learn pedagogy BUT also course content and how to teach it. Thereafter they will be seen as experienced teachers and the priority is getting students through exams. Whilst this is impirtant, it does mean that many teachers do not get the chance to improve their practice as this requires an element of trial and error and experimentation… difficult when results are at risk. MEds and NPQs may help (a bit), but I genuinely think that few teachers truly get the opportunity or support to improve further once they are seen as competent and experienced. Definitely food for thought here.