Not only is ISO 42001 risk based but it also includes a requirement to perform an A.I System Impact Assessment, considering impacts on individuals or groups of individuals and societies. Managing the impacts of A.I systems is likely to be key to complying with global A.I legislation and regulation in the future. Using ISO 42001 for your A.I management system provides a structured framework for managing risks, impacts and legal compliance. #iso42001 #ai #artificialintelligence #aiimpact #isocertification #growwithiso
Assent Risk Management’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
AI is making its presence well and truly known both in our personal and business lives. Awareness on the risks and, in particular, compliance is woefully lacking. With the 2 year compliance clock for the EU AI Act ticking now is the right time to start planning your compliance journey. ISO42001 is a great stepping stone towards EU AI Act compliance. Whilst ISO42001 is very new to the stage, organisations that are ISO27001 certified are already part of the way to being compliant to ISO42001. Whilst there are some differences the concept is the same. I'll be starting a weekly informational one minute read on the ways your current compliance scope will go a long way to help you on your journey. I'll be sharing risk assessment tips, documentation requirements (maybe even some templates) and awareness of the synergy between ISO27001, ISO42001 and the EU AI Act. So stay tuned for the upcoming weekly "WaiT a Minute" posts.
-
As artificial intelligence becomes integral to business operations, the need for standardized practices in AI management has never been more critical. Enter ISO/IEC 42001, the first global standard dedicated to AI management systems, offering a framework for ethical, transparent, and accountable AI usage. At Inspection Board, we're here to guide you through the ISO/IEC 42001 certification process. Our expert team ensures your organization benefits from enhanced transparency, robust risk management, and stringent regulatory compliance. Ready to build trust and ensure your AI systems are designed with human well-being at the forefront? Contact us to learn how we can help your organization achieve ISO/IEC 42001 certification. #AI #ISO42001 #ArtificialIntelligence #Governance #InspectionBoard #Certification
-
-
NZ Head of Delegation & Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC 42 "Artificial Intelligence" | Risk & Strategy Expert | Digital Transformation | Executive Coaching & AI Governance | Tailored Strategies for Organisational Growth |
Day 4: Why ISO/IEC 42001 Certification Matters Key Concept: Delving into the importance of ISO/IEC 42001 certification for organisations. Questions to Ask Yourself: * How does ISO/IEC 42001 certification ensure responsible AI use? * In what ways does the certification manage AI risks and opportunities? * How does achieving certification improve organisational credibility? Examples of Importance: * Demonstrating commitment to ethical principles in AI. * Systematic risk management: Identifies and mitigates potential AI risks. * Enhancing organisational reputation: Attracts customers and partnerships. #ISOIEC42001 #ResponsibleAI #AIEthics #RiskManagement #AIcertification #OrganisationalCredibility #EthicalAI #AIOpportunities #TechEthics #SustainableTech #AIForumNZ
-
🌐 Exploring ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Certification for Artificial Intelligence? ℹ️ At DQS, we're excited to introduce our certification service for ISO/IEC 42001:2023, specifically designed for Artificial Intelligence management systems. This standard helps organizations implement effective governance and management practices to ensure trustworthy AI solutions. ✅ Key Benefits of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Certification: 1. Enhanced Trust: Demonstrate your commitment to ethical and responsible AI practices. 2. Improved Compliance: Align with international standards for AI governance and risk management. 3. Operational Excellence: Optimize AI systems' performance and reliability. 📧 Reach out to me at narendra.g@dqs.de if your organization is interested in achieving ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certification or to learn more about our AI management system solutions. Let's empower your AI initiatives with trust and reliability! #ISO42001 #ArtificialIntelligence #AIManagement #CertificationServices #DQS #EthicalAI #TrustworthyAI
-
Unsure whether you need the newest standard on AI Management Systems: the ISO/IEC 42001? We got you covered! In our latest blog article, we explore the content of the #ISO42001 standard and answer the most relevant questions, such as “When and Why do companies need the ISO 42001?” and “Is implementing the ISO standard enough to fulfill the #EU #AIAct requirements?”. Find out below whether you would benefit from implementing the ISO 42001 standard and if yes, where to start! https://lnkd.in/ezCKm88b #ISOIEC42001 #ISO #AIMS #AIstandard #AIManagementSystems #AIGovernance
-
Conducting a GAP assessment against ISO 42001 for AI web applications involves several essential steps: 1. Understand the ISO 42001 requirements. 2. Define the scope of your assessment. 3. Gather relevant documentation. 4. Conduct a preliminary review. 5. Identify key areas for assessment (ethics, privacy, security, transparency, accountability). 6. Engage stakeholders through interviews and workshops. 7. Perform a detailed analysis of identified gaps. 8. Develop and prioritise an action plan. 9. Implement improvements. 10. Monitor and review compliance regularly. 11. Document the entire process. This structured approach ensures thorough evaluation and alignment with ISO 42001 standards, fostering ethical and secure AI system management. Hope this can help you start of your AI certification project use are partner MQA Certification UK Ltd. For a certification quote. #GAPAssessment #ISO42001 #WebApplications #OfficeAutomation #Compliance #AIManagement
-
Experienced Infomation Security and Artifical Intelligence Auditor and Consultant with 20+ years in cybersecurity, risk management, and compliance. Speciality ISO 27001 & ISO 42001 implementation and auditing.
I am excited to tell you all that I have successfully completed and passed the ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor course held by BSI! A huge thank you to our incredible instructor Derek L. for his guidance and support throughout the course (amazing energy) This course has provided me with a deep understanding of how to effectively audit AI management systems but also a deep insight into their implementation. Here are a couple of key takeaways: 1. Enhanced Risk Management: Gaining insights into identifying and mitigating risks associated with AI systems. 2. Compliance and Governance: Learning the best practices for ensuring AI systems comply with regulatory requirements and ethical standards. I'm excited to apply this knowledge and contribute to the responsible and efficient management of AI systems in my professional endeavors. #ISO42001 #ArtificialIntelligence #LeadAuditor #BSI #ProfessionalDevelopment
-
Great insights from Sarah Clarke as always. I completely agree with the perspective that certification is just one part of the AI governance story. Before jumping into certification, CTOs and CIOs should start by conducting a self assessment, using an approach such as Attercop’s AI Governance framework (our assessment is guided by the draft of the UKGov AI Management Essentials tool - link below). This helps assess your requirements in line with your organisation’s unique risk appetite, operational needs, and regulatory requirements. ISO 42001 is likely to play a part in our organisational AI journeys (just as ISO 27001 has become a de facto part of our cybersecurity maturity), but it’s not just about gaining a certification as a ‘hygiene factor’; it’s about making pragmatic decisions on AI governance and whether the framework provides meaningful value for your specific AI use cases - and whether in doing so it helps manage your organisation’s AI risks effectively. A structured approach, starting with assessment and then leading to action, ensures you focus on what truly matters - implementing governance that fits your context rather than chasing compliance for its own sake. #AIAssurance #AIRisk #ISO42001 #Governance
This is an excerpt from Anthropic's ISO 42001 certification announcement. An external accredited assessment body has deemed their AI Management System (AIMS) compliant with the standard. But what does that mean to Anthropic model integrators, or users that want to 'borrow' related comfort to show potential internal and external customers? We have plenty of ISO 27001 veterans who will understand this - the Information Security Management System (ISMS) with similar structure. This is about capability and structures to govern within the scope of the management system, not about any particular risk profile. People may be diligently documenting and managing a set of broken things, with essential elements outside AIMS scope, albeit with AIMS elements that help gain traction for improvements. It is largely use case agnostic as this is in foundation model context for a mainly general purpose AI vendor. We know such standards are only as good as their scope (or Statement of Applicability). Both the elements of the organisation (policies, standards, governance structures, risk and impact assessments, tools, processes, people, means to monitor and maintain on a rolling basis) and the specifics of risk appetites, benchmarks, controls, and assessments. The desire, effort, and expense to show workings out and have an independent assessment should offer some comfort, but the fact of certification is just part of the story. At a minimum you want to see the scope. Does it mean robust management of all the things that impact your downstream risk? How much residual risk do you have to manage? If things aren't fit for your purpose, can the supplier change them? Replies link to some of that scope information and the full announcement. I'm all for things that give AI governance some structure and edges. Just keen to give the structure and edges some context.
-
