Beyond Paris Energy’s Post

If you believe in global warming and tipping points, this is crucial for you. Our design is based on a solid mathematical foundation and not speculation or fantasy. We have successfully model tested the system and had 3 science professors verify our design. We are surrounded by gravity constantly, but we are told gravity is not an energy, so it cannot be converted to another form of energy. We now have a number of tidal generators converting tidal energy into electrical energy. Unlike the other types of ocean energy tidal energy comes from one source, gravity, depending on the alignment of the earth, moon and sun. What is gravity a force, an acceleration or a curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass. We are still struggling to define gravity but one thing we are sure of, it is responsible for worldwide tides. So, gravity that is not an energy, somehow pulls the oceans and seas backwards and forwards creating two high and two low tides per day all around the earth. This tidal energy can then be converted into electrical energy by machines like Orbital 02. “In any system of bodies whatever, to which no energy is communicated by external bodies, and which parts with no energy to external bodies, the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies remains forever unaltered.”  (Isaac Newton)   Our design is based on using gravity to remove energy from a system which causes the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies to be out of balance. We can choose how out of balance we want the system, so we can power any size of generator up to and including GE’s 1,755 mw generator, presently only used at nuclear power facilities. A 4mw wind turbine produces around 12,000 MWh per annum. A 10MW offshore wind turbine produces around 35,000 MWh per annum. A single unit of our system produces more than 15,000,000 MWh more than both turbines together. Presently it is the only serious alternative to nuclear fusion or fission as a replacement to fossil fuels. As Tom Steyer said in his book Cheaper, Faster, Better. We have the cheapest possible large capacity 100% green energy system. The system is mass producible and could be up and running worldwide faster than any alternative. We have the best system by far as our system can work anywhere, next to cities, next to existing infrastructure and even as an alternative source of power at existing power producing facilities. Contact us so we can prove to you what our system is capable of and the math and science it is based on and see how we go forward from there.

If you believe in global warming and tipping points, this is crucial for you. Our design is based on a solid mathematical foundation and not speculation or fantasy. We have successfully model tested the system and had 3 science professors verify our design. We are surrounded by gravity constantly, but we are told gravity is not an energy, so it cannot be converted to another form of energy. We now have a number of tidal generators converting tidal energy into electrical energy. Unlike the other types of ocean energy tidal energy comes from one source, gravity, depending on the alignment of the earth, moon and sun. What is gravity a force, an acceleration or a curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass. We are still struggling to define gravity but one thing we are sure of, it is responsible for worldwide tides. So, gravity that is not an energy, somehow pulls the oceans and seas backwards and forwards creating two high and two low tides per day all around the earth. This tidal energy can then be converted into electrical energy by machines like Orbital 02. “In any system of bodies whatever, to which no energy is communicated by external bodies, and which parts with no energy to external bodies, the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies remains forever unaltered.”  (Isaac Newton)   Our design is based on using gravity to remove energy from a system which causes the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies to be out of balance. We can choose how out of balance we want the system, so we can power any size of generator up to and including GE’s 1,755 mw generator, presently only used at nuclear power facilities. A 4mw wind turbine produces around 12,000 MWh per annum. A 10MW offshore wind turbine produces around 35,000 MWh per annum. A single unit of our system produces more than 15,000,000 MWh more than both turbines together. Presently it is the only serious alternative to nuclear fusion or fission as a replacement to fossil fuels. As Tom Steyer said in his book Cheaper, Faster, Better. We have the cheapest possible large capacity 100% green energy system. The system is mass producible and could be up and running worldwide faster than any alternative. We have the best system by far as our system can work anywhere, next to cities, next to existing infrastructure and even as an alternative source of power at existing power producing facilities. Contact us so we can prove to you what our system is capable of and the math and science it is based on and see how we go forward from there.

If you believe in global warming and tipping points, this is crucial for you. Our design is based on a solid mathematical foundation and not speculation or fantasy. We have successfully model tested the system and had 3 science professors verify our design. We are surrounded by gravity constantly, but we are told gravity is not an energy, so it cannot be converted to another form of energy. We now have a number of tidal generators converting tidal energy into electrical energy. Unlike the other types of ocean energy tidal energy comes from one source, gravity, depending on the alignment of the earth, moon and sun. What is gravity a force, an acceleration or a curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass. We are still struggling to define gravity but one thing we are sure of, it is responsible for worldwide tides. So, gravity that is not an energy, somehow pulls the oceans and seas backwards and forwards creating two high and two low tides per day all around the earth. This tidal energy can then be converted into electrical energy by machines like Orbital 02. “In any system of bodies whatever, to which no energy is communicated by external bodies, and which parts with no energy to external bodies, the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies remains forever unaltered.”  (Isaac Newton)   Our design is based on using gravity to remove energy from a system which causes the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies to be out of balance. We can choose how out of balance we want the system, so we can power any size of generator up to and including GE’s 1,755 mw generator, presently only used at nuclear power facilities. A 4mw wind turbine produces around 12,000 MWh per annum. A 10MW offshore wind turbine produces around 35,000 MWh per annum. A single unit of our system produces more than 15,000,000 MWh more than both turbines together. Presently it is the only serious alternative to nuclear fusion or fission as a replacement to fossil fuels. As Tom Steyer said in his book Cheaper, Faster, Better. We have the cheapest possible large capacity 100% green energy system. The system is mass producible and could be up and running worldwide faster than any alternative. We have the best system by far as our system can work anywhere, next to cities, next to existing infrastructure and even as an alternative source of power at existing power producing facilities. Contact us so we can prove to you what our system is capable of and the math and science it is based on and see how we go forward from there.

If you believe in global warming and tipping points, this is crucial for you. Our design is based on a solid mathematical foundation and not speculation or fantasy. We have successfully model tested the system and had 3 science professors verify our design. We are surrounded by gravity constantly, but we are told gravity is not an energy, so it cannot be converted to another form of energy. We now have a number of tidal generators converting tidal energy into electrical energy. Unlike the other types of ocean energy tidal energy comes from one source, gravity, depending on the alignment of the earth, moon and sun. What is gravity a force, an acceleration or a curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass. We are still struggling to define gravity but one thing we are sure of, it is responsible for worldwide tides. So, gravity that is not an energy, somehow pulls the oceans and seas backwards and forwards creating two high and two low tides per day all around the earth. This tidal energy can then be converted into electrical energy by machines like Orbital 02. “In any system of bodies whatever, to which no energy is communicated by external bodies, and which parts with no energy to external bodies, the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies remains forever unaltered.”  (Isaac Newton)   Our design is based on using gravity to remove energy from a system which causes the sum of the various potential and kinetic energies to be out of balance. We can choose how out of balance we want the system, so we can power any size of generator up to and including GE’s 1,755 mw generator, presently only used at nuclear power facilities. A 4mw wind turbine produces around 12,000 MWh per annum. A 10MW offshore wind turbine produces around 35,000 MWh per annum. A single unit of our system produces more than 15,000,000 MWh more than both turbines together. Presently it is the only serious alternative to nuclear fusion or fission as a replacement to fossil fuels. As Tom Steyer said in his book Cheaper, Faster, Better. We have the cheapest possible large capacity 100% green energy system. The system is mass producible and could be up and running worldwide faster than any alternative. We have the best system by far as our system can work anywhere, next to cities, next to existing infrastructure and even as an alternative source of power at existing power producing facilities. Contact us so we can prove to you what our system is capable of and the math and science it is based on and see how we go forward from there.

BloombergNEF's New Energy Outlook 2024 emphasizes the critical role of clean technologies in limiting global warming to below two degrees Celsius. The report presents two climate scenarios: the Net Zero Scenario (NZS) and the Economic Transition Scenario (ETS). The NZS, aiming for a 67% chance of limiting warming to 1.75 degrees Celsius, predicts a peak and rapid decline in fossil fuel demand starting in 2025, with a significant expansion of renewable energy, electric vehicles, carbon capture, and nuclear power by 2030. The ETS, driven by economic competitiveness and consumer choice, projects renewable energy, particularly solar and wind, to constitute 51% of global power generation by 2030 and 70% by 2050, supported by advanced energy storage and flexible power systems. David Hostert, lead author, stresses the urgent need for immediate emission reductions to keep the net zero by mid-century goal achievable. Cleaning up the power sector is vital, potentially avoiding half of the emissions by 2050 compared to a no-transition scenario. https://lnkd.in/etgN3VAk #Bloomberg #EnergyTransition #OdinGlobal

The scale of the challenge for carbon capture. This project is viewed as large. “”Swiss start-up Climeworks intends to suck 36,000 tonnes of CO2 from the air annually to bury underground,..”” A 600MW coal power plant produces about 6M tons of CO2/yr and a natural gas plant about 3M tons CO2 per year. The scale up of carbon capture still has a ways to go. It is likely faster and less expensive to focus on building renewables and nuclear power to supply electricity to society while reducing CO2 and continue using natural gas as a bridge into the future.

As global leaders convene at COP28 in Dubai this week, discussions on climate change and the energy transition take the spotlight. Aligning policies for the future of energy is complex, with nations juggling conflicting priorities. Ipsos data reveals insights from 24,000 individuals across 28 countries on energy issues. 🌍 Top Issue: Energy Security The Ukraine-Russia conflict has heightened concerns, leading countries like Germany to bolster coal production and extend the lifespan of nuclear power plants for winter heating. Achieving energy self-sufficiency is a key priority for nations like the U.S., Canada, Italy, and France. #COP28 #ClimateChange #EnergyTransition #EnergySecurity #IpsosData #GlobalLeadership

A Global Heating Dilemma 🤔 “If we don’t take further steps now, some neighbourhoods and communities will become so hot people will struggle to live there. It’s not something that’s far off, it’s here now and it will define the coming decades,” Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie. 🥵 “The Coalition's nuclear energy scheme would see a whopping 1 billion extra tonnes of climate pollution from burning more coal and gas.” 😳 As a coal supporter these posts from Climate Council made me have a closer look at the potential warming impact of our energy choices! How hot would our already sweltering Aussie summers be in 2050 if we did include nuclear ⚛️ in our energy mix (the Liberal’s plan) instead of all renewables (Labor’s plan) and released another billion tonnes of CO2? 🥵 In fact, how much hotter would we be if we didn’t build any more renewables and just maintained and extended the current coal base load plants? Or replaced them at some point them modern coal plants? With two very different energy futures on offer this election I personally consulted the SCIENCE to understand what we are playing for. The stakes are high given our current energy cost of living crisis vs our potential for future global boiling! The Results 🤯 The modelling used by the IPCC (the official climate science body) indicates a temperature rise of ~0.5 degrees C per trillion tonnes of CO2 released to the atmosphere. Let’s assume this is correct. Thus Labor’s “all renewables” plan would save only 0.0015 degrees 🔎 in warming post 2050 compared to our current (coal) system at a cost to Australia of over A$1 trillion ($100,000 per household over 25 years). 🤦♂️ The Liberal’s preferred nuclear and renewables plan would make our cites only 0.0005 of a degree warmer than Labor’s plan at a cost of over A$330 billion (over $33,000 per household). So that’s what we are arguing over between the two major parties plans, half of a thousandth of a degree. Not sheep stations… 🐑 But there is a third option not being considered by either major party. Replacing our current coal fleet with modern, efficient coal fired power stations. That would result in our cities being a balmy 0.001 degrees warmer 😱 than under Labor’s plan at a rough cost of A$63 billion in capital plus operating costs. These coal plants can be simply retrofitted down the track with carbon capture technology if we decide to do so. Why does the CSIRO’s GenCost exclude by far the cheapest option when the temperature impact is so minuscule? 🤦🏻 My workings are in comments below for those interested. The Implications 😤 One thing seems clear, those predicting global boiling due to Australia’s energy choices might have to wait a very long time. 🐢 It surprises me that the use of our cheap and abundant coal to keep the lights on is seen as politically challenging when most voters are prioritising cost of living over expensive energy transition plans. 🤑

The stream of posts by Fossil Fuel and Nuclear industry owners, investors and other beneficiaries are steadily increasing on LI. For most of people professionally involved or actively following/engaging the realm of energy, it is clear why. The relentlessly decreasing prices of key Renewable Energy components in combination with massive differences in short-term and long-term negative human health and Climate impacts (FF) and on the other hand the vast differences in real world timeframes needed for the completion of the new power plants (Nuclear) are already compelling in a world of accelerating AGW and rising consumer prices in food and other mandatory living costs. A strong motivation for this type of unfounded criticism of RE in social media (and all others) is the decentralized future in energy. Versus heavily centralized Incumbent industrial energy structures. a. manufacturers of the biggest electricity power plants (nuclear, coal) b. privately owned grid infrastructure, shipping infrastructure, O&G pipelines c. financial institutions focused and capable on financing biggest energy projects d. Profits in non-fuel sourced energy vs. continuous-fuel-feed type of thermal energy sources (RE has statistically smaller profit margins) other points e. the emerging new technologies replacing FF combustion for industrial heat f. electrification of everything In an industry with combined annual profits in trillions of dollars and currently a surging global total demand for energy for the foreseeable future, it becomes clear the incumbent financial and thermal energy industries have an almost unprecedented amount of financial interests (old infrastructure and future market potential) to protect. In the case of FF there is even the potential threat of eventually soon becoming obsolete, since the EROI has plummeted to similar and lower levels compared to solar and wind while the FF externalities are compounding and have the potential to soon threat human societies as we understand them today. Please leave Your comments. Science denial comments will be moderated.

Importance of Global Energy Transition and its impact on Climate Change 90% of global energy transitions fail for the same reason: they ignore this critical factor. They overlook the role of renewable energy. Let's dive in. A nation decides to shift from fossil fuels, It begins its energy transition. It invests in nuclear power and that's where the problem arises. It focused solely on a controversial energy source. It hopes that with this new direction, it can reduce its carbon footprint, And it falls flat because it still contributes to climate change. This is a common scenario I see with many countries. They have high hopes, They want to become sustainable quickly and especially with big projects right away. But energy transition is like a marathon, You can't hope to finish the race if you start sprinting. You have to pace yourself, And it's the same thing with your energy transition strategy. You have to learn to invest in energy sources that: - are sustainable for your environment, - will provide for your population, - will contribute to the global fight against climate change. Loyalty to fossil fuels is deceiving you. And I'm going to explain how. Traditional energy industries are adept at exploiting your economic biases. 1️⃣ The sunk cost fallacy to entice you to stick with fossil fuels by highlighting the investments already made. This large sum has caught your attention. Instead of considering the environmental cost, you're fixated on the monetary investment and you stick to it. 2️⃣ Inertia to keep you in the system. Why not just transition to renewables? Humans seek to conserve energy as much as possible. Your mind focuses on the work that would need to be done to transition rather than the actual benefits. A policy to change, an infrastructure to build... You'll deal with it later. 3️⃣ Loss aversion to retain you. You've decided to make the transition. Your mind starts to worry about all the investments you're going to lose, without considering what you'll really gain. This is what they call loss aversion. We feel a loss much more intensely than an equivalent gain. But remember, the true loss is not in the monetary investments, but in the irreversible damage to our planet.