BharatLaw.ai’s Post

In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India clarified the doctrine of legitimate expectation, emphasizing that it cannot be extended to private contractual disputes. The Court highlighted that legitimate expectation must be based on a legal right or consistent practice by a public authority, not mere hope or anticipation. This ruling affirms that private entities are not bound by the same public law doctrines as governmental bodies, and disputes must be resolved based on the established legal framework. #supremecourt #legitimateexpectation #publiclaw #contractlaw #employmentlaw #legaldoctrine #legalprinciples #judgment #lawupdates #legalnews #indiancourts #privatevspublic #lawandjustice ⚖️📜

⏭️ Coming up next! ⏭️ Article 3 - The Law of Adverse Possession This A-3 is all about exploring Supreme Court of India's recent stance on on the Doctrine of Adverse Possession—balancing property rights and legal claims. Stay Tuned! 27th November 2024 at 12.30 p.m. #LegalInsights #AdversePossession #SupremeCourtofIndia

In a recent judgment by the Supreme Court of India, the power of summoning additional accused was revisited. The case involved a detailed analysis of legal principles and precedents, shaping the decision-making process. This summary delves into the key aspects of the case, shedding light on the implications for future legal proceedings. https://lnkd.in/dNR3sM2X

Today's the day! Don't miss out on the insightful discussion about Legal Insights and Strategies to combat Counterfeiting and Smuggling with Mr. PK Malhotra, Former Secretary of Law at the Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India. Join us today at 7 pm!

On September 2, the government established 23rd Law Commission of India for a three-year term. The Commission works on projects based on the references received from the Central Government and/or from the Supreme Court and High Courts. Our Partner (Head - Disputes) Indranil Deshmukh in an article published in the The Economic Times shares his views on Inclusion of measures to improve Judicial Administration within the scope of reference of the 23rd Law Commission. Read it at: https://lnkd.in/g22BwdUF #DisputeResolution #LawCommission #JudicialAdministration

Discover the 25 essential things every law student must know about the Constitution of India Don't miss out! Tap the link to learn more https://lnkd.in/d6kiT7YZ #ConstitutionOfIndia #LegalKnowledge #LawStudents

Supreme Court Upholds Court's Power to Grant Bail in Cases of Delayed Trial U/s 45 PMLA. Read more at: https://lnkd.in/dwGcDdHM #SupremeCourt #PMLA #law #legal #lawyer #advocates #LegalInsights #JurAceLegalLLP

Prosecution Must Prove Exclusive Knowledge for Accused Statements to Be Used in Fact Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Supreme Court. Read more at: https://lnkd.in/gsamywYM #SupremeCourt #Section27 #EvidenceAct #legal #lawyer #law #advocate #LegalInsights #JurAceLegalLLP

Flexibility in Legal Timelines: Condonation of Delay for Acquittal Appeals In a landmark decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Mohd Abaad Ali v. Directorate of Revenue Prosecution Intelligence has clarified the applicability of s. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to appeals against acquittal under s. 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Authored by our associate Mr. Aditya Gupta, the judgment underscores that delays in filing such appeals can be condoned, offering prosecutorial authorities a broader scope for seeking justice. This pivotal ruling revisits and distinguishes from past precedents under the older 1908 Act, highlighting a progressive interpretation that aligns with contemporary legal frameworks. It represents a significant step in ensuring that procedural limitations do not hinder the pursuit of justice, especially in cases with substantial public interest. For a detailed analysis and further insights, please read the full article here: https://lnkd.in/gBemFC7q #MetalegalAdvocates #MetalegalCourtRulings #SupremeCourtIndia #LimitationAct #CriminalLaw #AppealRights #LegalAnalysis #TimelineFlexibility

In the intricate web of legal proceedings, time often plays a pivotal role, dictating the fate of cases and the dispensation of justice. The recent judgment by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Purni Devi & Anr. vs. Babu Ram & Anr. sheds light on the nuanced application of limitation laws, particularly regarding the exclusion of time spent pursuing remedies in good faith before the wrong forum. This blog delves into the significance of time exclusion provisions in ensuring fairness and equity within the legal system, and how they serve as a beacon of hope for litigants navigating the complexities of litigation. #LegalCase #LimitationAct #JusticeServed https://lnkd.in/gECzNf2C