Changing Minds’ Post

The powerful haka performed by Te Pati Māori MPs in New Zealand’s Parliament — in protest of a bill seeking to reinterpret the historic 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, a cornerstone of Māori rights— highlights a fundamental truth that communications professionals understand well: You cannot *not* communicate. Communication isn’t just about words; it’s an ongoing, dynamic state that includes actions, expressions, and presence. Even in silence—or in a resonant dance like the haka—we convey values, beliefs, and convictions. The MPs’ haka delivered a message of strength and solidarity, embodying emotions that words alone might not achieve. For those of us in #communications, this is a reminder of our role in capturing and amplifying not just what is said, but also the unspoken dimensions of a message. Communication is always at work, shaping perceptions and intentions. As communicators, we strive to channel these elements into messages that are authentic, impactful, and lasting. https://lnkd.in/eE7dwdGk #communications #PublicAffairs #ForeignPolicy #PublicRelations

Another achievement for public expression and reclaiming our civic space. Since August last year, me and my colleague Haris Azhar together with Aliansi Jurnalis Independen (AJI) Indonesia, Themis Law Firm and Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia supported by an amazing team of young lawyers submitted a Judicial Review to the Constitutional Court to revoke the articles of public disorder, hoax and defamation that frequently used to criminalized critics and protests. Hopefully, this progress could affect people that currently face criminal charges because of their critics and for the future of fundamental freedoms in Indonesia. More explanation about the Constitutional Court verdict can be read here: https://lnkd.in/gM3aF6WK

Putting aside for a moment, if you can, what prompted the haka in Parliament last week for a thought. (I realise this is a big ask, and encourage sharing your views in the process we now find ourselves). I wonder if we’ve just caught a glimpse of what Parliament might look like if it brought together the customs and practices in discussion, debating, and ways of communicating of both parties of our founding document. Anyone who’s had the fortune of participating in or learning about powhiri and practices on the marae knows how they create spaces for coming together and sharing views, listening, waiting your turn, and reinforcing and supporting speakers’ messages through waiata (or haka). What would Parliament’s rules look like if they were redesigned to integrate, allow for, and enable both Crown and Māori ways of having difficult discussions? (A recommendation and shout out to Te Wānanga o Aotearoa for their amazingly welcoming kaiako (teachers) and Tikanga level 3 course (Te Whāinga or te Ao Tikanga). It’s a free course for citizens or residents, and well worth the time. It’s also great to experience the discomfort of being in someone else’s space and customs, and trying to do the right thing and find your place.)

Today marks 189 years since the signing of He Whakaputanga, the first written document to express rangatiratanga on behalf of hapū, and a precursor to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Subsequent national discussion about rangatiratanga has often centred on constitutional arrangements and government obligations. But here, a group of Māori laws and philosphy students offer a reminder that the expression of rangatiratanga is rooted in whānau action, not government permission. Read more below >> https://lnkd.in/gf6hvkhp

It is interesting having a Linked In acquaintance whose perspective is the antithesis of your own in a number of key areas, but still remain polite and cordial. As I watch the end of days in the US and the climate catastrophe we are witnessing, I ask my self what’s the problem with insisting that we here in Aotearoa New Zealand focus on managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources, and recognise and provide for the protection of land that is of national importance! For us and for all those who follow in our footsteps, let’s ENSURE (a) The preservation of the natural character of the coastal environment (including the coastal marine area), wetlands, and lakes and rivers and their margins, and the protection of them from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development: (b) The protection of outstanding natural features and landscapes from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development: (c) The protection of areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats of indigenous fauna: (d) The maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along the coastal marine area, lakes, and rivers: (e) The relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, waahi tapu, and other taonga. (f) the protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development. (g) the protection of protected customary rights. (h) the management of significant risks from natural hazards. Why is that so threatening people!

Procedural Law plays a crucial role in Indonesia, as proven by its impact on legal proceedings throughout history. Even when the correct laws are applied, a procedural law violation can lead to losing a case. Focusing on procedural aspects is always essential for achieving a successful legal outcome. https://lnkd.in/grbMfWu3 #ProceduralLaw #LegalSystem #Indonesia

Takkanlah seluruh Malaysia tidak tahu akan kewujudan Seksyen 7 Akta 56 - Akta Keterangan dan kegunaan Illustrasi (b). Air mani siapakah yang dijumpai dalam Lubang Bontot atau Dubur Saiful? Jenayah LIWAT berlaku melibatkan Lubang Bontot Saiful yang diliwat. Berbalik kepada Illustrasi (b) Seksyen 7 Akta 56. Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue 7. Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened or which afforded an opportunity of their occurrence or transaction, are relevant. https://lnkd.in/gcJwNwzv

worth to read to understand the case

This is the important case in Malaysia by now

Culture and Tradition are things that should doing practically and consistency for future being