No one will really find out right? - When writing your CV, there is always a temptation to "tweak" the resume in a way that makes your profile look strong. This has become a normalised point now simply because due to the volume of CVs flying around on the world wide web, most of these modifications go un-noticed. Speaking purely from a personal point of view, I always advise people to simply tell the truth on the CV. If your official job title for example was not "Project Manager", then simply do not state it. Yes, I appreciate that you may have handled tasks to this level or in your day-to-day duty, it may have been an unwritten point that you were viewed as the Project Manager, but at the end of the day, it was not your official job title. A request from your new employer of your experience certificate will quickly start causing issues when they see a different title. This goes towards damaging your brand and staying as a record and a memory for many people that interacted with you in the hiring cycle. If you wish to show that you have operated at a senior level, you are best advised to write that about your achievements in the job explanation part of your resume. This way, you are being transparent and making sure that your profile is clear of any misconceptions. As always, this is not a guaranteed method to gt a job, but simply some friendly advice. I hope it helps. www.keo.com/careers
Thank you for sharing your post, In my perspective, it’s reasonable to present a job title on a CV that aligns with the duties and responsibilities someone has performed, provided it truthfully reflects their work. For example, I’ve encountered instances where someone held a “junior” title officially but was performing the duties of a senior-level position for years. In such cases, listing the functional title that best describes their actual contributions seems fair, as long as it is accurate and honest. Of course, it becomes untruthful if none of the duties associated with the listed title were performed. Misrepresentation is certainly a concern, but in my view, the real issue is the candidate's ability to demonstrate competence and alignment with the job requirements during the interview process. From my recent experience interviewing candidates, I’ve found that what matters most isn’t the title on a CV but the skills, accomplishments, and ability to fulfill the tasks outlined in the vacancy description. This focus ensures that we evaluate candidates based on their actual capabilities rather than their titles alone. Thanks
Very helpfulp
Edwin Onyango
2mo
Great advice
Operations HSE Advisor at Chevron's TCO 3GP Plant. I lead safety initiatives in mega-projects with 100,000 manpower. ePTW, CoW, MVS, Investigations, Site Safety Expert. NEBOSH IGC, ISO 45001: 2018.
2moThank you for sharing this thought-provoking perspective on CV honesty. Your post raises an important point about the current state of job applications and recruitment. While I agree that honesty is crucial, I can’t help but consider the potential consequences of being completely truthful in a landscape where exaggeration has become commonplace. It’s a concerning thought that a fully honest CV might appear weak in comparison to embellished ones. Even more troubling is the possibility that recruiters, accustomed to inflated resumes, might perceive a truthful CV as already containing exaggerations. This creates a challenging dilemma for job seekers who want to maintain their integrity while remaining competitive.