Navigating the Grant Review Process:
Key Insights and What Reviewers Look For
PT. 1
The grant review process is a critical element in the distribution of funding for research, projects, and initiatives across various fields. It ensures that resources are allocated to the most promising and impactful proposals, supporting innovation, advancement, and solutions to societal problems. Understanding this process and knowing what reviewers look for can significantly increase the chances of securing a grant.
The Grant Review Process
1. Submission: The process begins with the submission of a proposal. Applicants must adhere to specific guidelines provided by the funding organization, including deadlines, format, and required documentation.
2. Administrative Review: Once submitted, proposals undergo an administrative review. This initial check ensures that all required elements are present and that the proposal complies with the eligibility criteria. Incomplete or non-compliant proposals are typically rejected at this stage.
3. Preliminary Review: Proposals that pass the administrative review are then subjected to a preliminary review by a panel of experts in the relevant field. This phase involves a more detailed examination of the proposal's content, though it is still relatively high-level.
4. In-depth Peer Review: The core of the grant review process is the in-depth peer review. This involves multiple experts independently evaluating the proposal. Reviewers assess various aspects such as the significance of the project, the quality and feasibility of the methodology, the qualifications of the team, and the potential impact of the outcomes.
5. Panel Review: After individual reviews, a panel review meeting is held. This meeting brings together all reviewers to discuss each proposal in detail, resolve differences in individual assessments, and rank proposals based on their merit. The panel may include both external experts and representatives from the funding organization.
6. Funding Decision: Based on the recommendations of the review panel, the funding organization makes the final funding decisions. These decisions consider the reviewers' rankings, the strategic goals of the funding body, and the available budget.
7. Notification and Feedback: Applicants are notified of the funding decision. Successful applicants receive detailed instructions on the next steps, while unsuccessful applicants often receive feedback to improve future proposals.
Jeremy Burwell
Kingdom Works Giving, Inc.
contact@kingdomworksgiving.org
www.kingdomworksgiving.org
#grantwriter #grantwriting #nonprofitconsulting