Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study https://ow.ly/HsUQ50SQHVP
Christopher Robinson’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study https://ow.ly/VSEg50SZZbQ
-
-
Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study https://ow.ly/eNO750SNUEs
-
-
Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study https://ow.ly/eNO750SNUEs
-
-
Umbilical artery eucapnic pH to assess fetal well-being https://ow.ly/6Vzo50TbSTI
-
-
Desirability of outcome ranking for obstetrical trials: illustration and application to the ARRIVE trial https://ow.ly/AXMt50R4QEI
-
An experienced radiologist who wants to specialize in diagnostic and interventional pediatric radiology, particularly in the field of neuroradiology, cardiovascular imaging, and oncology.
Also prudent to check the heart and kidney of the fetal MRI if available as angiomyolipomas and rhadomyomas are also common in TSC1 (9q34) or TSC2 (16p13.3) mutations seen in Tuberous Sclerosis. As always, superb learning tips from Spin Academics! To know more, check spinacademics.org!
Tip of the day 💡: One of the not to miss antenatal diagnoses is Tuberous Sclerosis. Note the right frontal tuber and the multiple subependymal nodules on this fetal MR. Did you know that SEGAs and SENs have no histologic differences?
-
-
PhD Student | Prevention of Violence Against Women | Female genital mutilation/cutting| Health Promotion | Global Health |Midwife| FGM/C National Advisory Committee member | Monash University | Australia
I am researching on female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), and I came across a systematic review article discussing "medical deinfibulation". I was keen to delve into the results section to ascertain the number of papers included and to review the recommendations provided. I went through it, and ended as: Results: No eligible studies were identified. Conclusion: There is no evidence to conclude that counselling before deinfibulation influences patients ‘satisfaction with overall quality of care or rates of request for reinfibulation. I am wondering how and why?
-
AJOG Expert Review in Labor: The second stage of labor - Disorders of fetal descent Composite labor graph demonstrating normal dilatation (A), normal descent (B), protracted descent (C), arrest of descent (D), and failure of descent (E). https://ow.ly/2Ci750Pom5E
-
