You know that classic “accessible” entrance, the one relegated to the back of a building? The one at the end of the cracked and uneven path, next to the trash, with hardly any light? With a wobbly ramp that seems more a hazard than help? That wobbly ramp is the physical representation of a checkbox—bare minimum #disability compliance. It is a representation of the fact that only 5% of organizations have inclusion programs focused on disability. It’s a representation of the fact that the majority of people with disabilities are afraid to disclose their disability, chronic illness, or #MentalHealth difference at work. That wobbly ramp is also a material equivalent of the begrudging sighs, eye rolls, and lengthy “prove it” processes that meet basic accessibility requests for nonapparent conditions, like adding transcripts to training videos or removing migraine-inducing visual effects. It is a symbol of a performative illusion of disability inclusion. An afterthought. A reminder to “know your place and be grateful for what you get.” A reminder that you don’t really belong. Wobbly ramps and the reluctant provision of transcripts are symbols of systemic ableism and neuroableism. Systemic ableism starts with an organizational entry. For many disabled and neurodivergent people, entering the workforce is just like that backdoor-ramp experience: separate, shrouded in stigma, and not even close to equal. Let’s be honest: If companies were truly inclusive, there would be no need for specialized routes or agencies. Just like if front entrances were built for accessibility, there would be no need for precarious ramps in back alleys. We can do better. We can design fully inclusive #HumanResources systems. Read more: https://lnkd.in/gNfqjzuA
"Disabled and neurodivergent employees should be genuinely supported to pursue growth and leadership opportunities. This can be facilitated through mentorship programs, leadership training, transparent internal job postings, and, most of all, the removal of systemic barriers and decision-making biases."
"Performance reviews should be based on outcomes and contributions rather than productivity theater or adhering to one-size-fits-all working methods. When evaluations focus on actual results and contributions rather than on arbitrary standards, they are fairer to all employees."
"Normalizing flexibility for all supports inclusion and helps address one of the key problems with accommodations—the fear of discrimination often associated with disability disclosure."
Award-Winning Author, The Canary Code | Professor, Organizational Psychology & Business | Speaker | Culture | HR | Inclusion | Belonging | Wellbeing | 🚫 Moral Injury | Neurodiversity | Autism @ Work | Global Diversity |
4mo"Inclusion shouldn’t be a reluctant concession or a handout. And accessibility should not be an afterthought. We can embed disability inclusion in talent processes, seamlessly and organically."