Curei.ai’s Post

1️⃣ Objective: To assess GPT-4's capability in answering clinically relevant questions based on ASCO and ESMO guidelines. 2️⃣ Method: GPT-4 responses were evaluated with and without retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). GPT-4 with RAG showed significantly higher accuracy. 3️⃣ Findings: GPT-4 with RAG provided 84% correct responses, whereas GPT-4 without RAG provided only 57% correct responses. 4️⃣ Guideline Comparisons: Key differences in recommendations for pancreatic, colorectal, and hepatocellular cancers were identified. For instance, ESMO uniquely proposed liver transplantation for certain colorectal cancer cases, and ASCO discussed socioeconomic factors affecting patient outcomes. 5️⃣ Performance Metrics: The study used faithfulness and relevance metrics for automated evaluation, supplemented by manual reviews from oncology experts. 6️⃣ Error Analysis: Among the incorrect responses, 4 were considered medically relevant due to factual misinformation, highlighting areas for model improvement.

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics