Dante DeAscanis’ Post

View profile for Dante DeAscanis, graphic

Oncogenesis | NGS | Molecular Genetics | Computational Biology

Here's a pretty insightful preprint from the Pachter lab : https://lnkd.in/gUziwec3 which showcases how both Seurat and Scanpy give different results between each other as well as between versions. I think more studies like this are necessary to bring to fruition how as computational biologists/data scientists, we should always be wary of any technical biases in our analysis pipelines, especially in scRNA-seq analysis. Below is one example, wherein calculating residual variances in scanpy is biased towards higher expression genes, while using the variance stabilization method (v2) in Seurat effectively corrects for this bias.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Dante DeAscanis

Oncogenesis | NGS | Molecular Genetics | Computational Biology

6mo

Denver Ncube, Ph.D. thanks for reposting! Glad you found this useful!

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics