Think it’s brilliant when clubs with clear principles and values stand by them. Most clubs and their leaders would crumble under the pressure of a manager demanding more in these types of situations.
Brighton recently parted ways with DZ due to a disagreement on transfer strategy. The question now is whether the club should adjust given all DZ achieved in the last two years, or should DZ have accepted the club's tradition and values in the transfer market?
It's interesting to compare Brighton's approach to other clubs like Chelsea and United, with no clear identity around the transfer market. They're like kids in a sweet shop, 'throw it in the bag and hope it works'. But only the next manager doesn't like those sweets and throws them out for some newer, tastier treats. Whereas, Brighton have a structured system where they sign young players pre-premier league ability, develop and sell them.
In my opinion, if a coach has proven themselves capable of increasing the club's success and subsequently their riches, they should get more say in all aspects of the club. It's the only way the Klopp's, Simeone's and Fergie's are made.
What do you think? Should Brighton have adjusted to DZ's strategy or should DZ have accepted the club's values? Let's discuss because I think Brighton might have missed out on the potential to make a legacy manager at the club!
https://lnkd.in/eg2XYWua Roberto De Zerbi’s Brighton exit is the only solution due to irreconcilable differences
Managing Director at Tayside Machinery
3moWell deserved 👏