Edgewater Higher Education Solutions’ Post

⚖️ Bombay High Court: Can Intellectual Disability Deny Motherhood Rights? As a law student, I was deeply moved by the Bombay High Court’s recent deliberation on a sensitive yet critical issue: *Does a woman with borderline intellectual disability have the right to be a mother?* The case involves a 27-year-old woman with an IQ of 75, whose father sought termination of her 21-week pregnancy, citing her mental condition. The woman, however, expressed her desire to continue the pregnancy, supported by a medical board's report deeming her fit to do so. The court posed a significant question: - *Should below-average intelligence bar someone from embracing parenthood?* The court emphasized that denying such a fundamental right undermines the dignity and autonomy of individuals with intellectual disabilities. This case challenges us to reflect on the interplay between legal rights, mental health, and societal norms. As aspiring legal professionals, it’s a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding human rights while balancing individual autonomy with societal responsibilities. How do we, as future lawyers, address such ethical dilemmas in our practice? Comment your views below. #LawStudentThoughts #JudicialReasoning #HumanRights #MentalHealth #LegalEthics

Addressing Rising Teen Pregnancies The increase in teenage pregnancies linked to the inability to pay school fees is a pressing issue that demands attention on multiple fronts. Firstly, legally, such situations often involve complex considerations. Statutory rape laws, which vary by jurisdiction, are critical, as sexual activity with minors can lead to criminal charges regardless of consent, particularly when there's a significant age gap. Child protection laws also co... [...] #TeenPregnancies Read more... https://lnkd.in/dvkgVNSW

In a recent landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court has made a crucial ruling regarding the determination of age in cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court emphasized that when age is assessed using a bone age ossification test, the upper age limit in the reference range should be considered. The Division Bench, comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain, stated, “In such cases of sexual assault, wherever, the court is called upon to determine the age of the victim based on 'bone age ossification report,' the upper age given in 'reference range' be considered as the age of the victim.” The principle of "margin of error" must be applied in these instances. This decision arose from a reference received from a POCSO court. In the absence of school records or a birth certificate, a bone age ossification test was conducted on the victim. The test indicated the victim's age to be between 16 to 18 years, based on general, physical, dental, and radiological characteristics. The court underscored that the POCSO Act does not prescribe a specific procedure for adjudicating and evaluating the age of a child in such cases. The bench concurred with a previous ruling in "State v. Basir Ahmad", which advocated for considering the upper limit of the ossification report and allowing an additional margin of two years. Moreover, the court referenced the Supreme Court’s ruling in "Rajak Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh", which highlighted that radiological examination age assessments are not always precise and must account for a margin of error. This directive will be circulated to all concerned Courts and Principal District & Sessions Judges to ensure uniformity and compliance in future cases. Key Takeaways: - Upper age limit in bone age ossification reports should be considered in POCSO cases. - A margin of error principle must be applied. - Uniformity in adjudicating age determination across all concerned courts. This ruling is pivotal for ensuring justice and accuracy in age determination under the POCSO Act. As legal professionals, staying updated with such significant judgments is crucial for our practice and advocacy. #LegalUpdate #POCSO #DelhiHighCourt #AgeDetermination #Justice #LegalProfessionals #LawyersOfLinkedIn #LegalCommunity #CourtRuling #ChildProtection #LegalPractice

Understanding Title IX: Impact on Parental Rights & FERPA FULL VIDEO: https://lnkd.in/d5Hc6-Py Follow us: https://lnkd.in/dgdVVveY https://lnkd.in/dS2CRBBN #cos #conventionofstates #conventionofstatesnow #titleix Explore the implications of Title IX on parental rights, education, and FERPA privacy laws. Learn how proposed changes may affect parents and students. #TitleIX #ParentalRights #FERPA #EducationLaws #StudentPrivacy #EducationRights #ProposedChanges #Parenting #StudentProtection #LegalKnowledge

On April 19, 2024, the Biden administration announced significant updates to Title IX, impacting K-12 and higher education institutions. These changes enhance protections for LGBTQI+ and pregnant individuals and streamline the reporting process for sex-based discrimination, including harassment. Ready to comply by the August 1 deadline? Explore legal and consulting services through E&I to stay ahead. 👉 Learn more and contact your E&I Member Representative today! #TitleIX #EducationEquity https://hubs.la/Q02xpMCz0

I'd like to pose a question that I see as looming and potentially headed our way as a neurodiverse movement members. By advocating for autism as being explicitly and only a strength, and an identity. Is it worth this position, if we are running the risk of losing legal protections? More specifically legal defenses with education settings (primary, secondary, and post-secondary), criminal defenses, workplace accomodation protection, and medical supports. Nobody thought women would lose abortion privileges and yet here we are, with Row V. Wade. Is it that outlandish to think autism and other neurodiversity protections could lose protections.

The conversation surrounding autism—and neurodiversity more broadly—needs to embrace complexity and trade-offs. From an evolutionary and energy perspective, all traits come with costs and benefits depending on the environmental context. Stress and energy regulation shape neurodiverse adaptations, leading to both unique traits and their associated trade-offs. Recognizing this balance helps avoid binary narratives that pit strengths against struggles. It is concerning to see efforts to separate autism from co-occurring traits and conditions. While once necessary under the medical treatment paradigm, it is time to shift to a broader understanding of neurodiversity. All neurotypes emerge as interconnected systems, shaped by stress, energy dynamics, and environmental factors. Neurodivergent traits and co-occurring conditions are emergent properties of adaptive processes within complex, dynamic systems. In a post Dobbs context, where established rights are being re-examined or rescinded, the risk of eroding accommodations for autistic and disabled individuals cannot be ignored. Denying or minimizing the real trade-offs within neurodivergent profiles risks weakening the frameworks that protect these rights. What we need is a paradigm that values the whole person—one that acknowledges traits, trade-offs, and the adaptive nature of neurodiversity while affirming the right to accommodations and support. Shifting from selection-based evolutionary arguments to complexity evolution and from deficit-based medicine to energy dynamics will be critical, both scientifically and politically. By doing so, we can ensure that we celebrate traits while protecting the rights and well-being of all individuals, particularly in uncertain political climates.

Wondering if you're fit for legitimation in Georgia? Courts examine your conduct and history, including domestic violence, criminal activity, and drug use, to determine your fitness. Understanding these factors can help you navigate the process and secure your parental rights. #FathersRights #Legitimation #ParentalRights #GeorgiaLaw #FamilyLaw #UnmarriedParents #LegalAdvice #Fatherhood #KnowYourRights #ChildCustody

DSS Investigations: Understanding Your Parental Rights and Responsibilities Being involved in a DSS investigation can feel overwhelming, especially for parents who don’t fully understand the process. Many ask, “What are my rights?” As a parent, you have the right to be informed of the allegations against you, to have legal representation during interviews, and to refuse entry into your home without a warrant. It’s crucial to cooperate while protecting your family’s rights. We work to ensure your family is treated fairly throughout the investigation. Have you ever been involved in a DSS case or know someone who has? What was the most confusing part? #DSSInvestigations #ParentalRights #FamilyLawSupport

An interesting book tip for professionals working in the field of #juvenilejustice and #youthcare: 'Juvenile Delinquency and Rehabilitation. Examining the Good Lives Model.' by Colinda Serie. "The Good Lives Model is an upcoming theoretical rehabilitation framework that is used increasingly in juvenile offender rehabilitation. This book provides in-depth knowledge about the Good Lives Model, its underlying theories, and how it differs from traditional rehabilitation methods. Furthermore it helps to gain a better understanding of the underlying causes of criminal behavior in juveniles, and the challenges they face in reintegrating into society. It combines state-of-the-art theoretical literature reviews with both qualitative and quantitative scientific research methods to comprehensively assess the applicability of the Good Lives Model with adolescents." Link: https://lnkd.in/eFsHPwue. #GLM #GoodLivesModel #GLMNetwork