EPOC Enviro’s Post

🗞 A new study published in Chemistry World estimates that some 68.1kg of #PFAS enters the sea annually from the River Mersey (UK), making it amongst the highest in the world. Experts acknowledge this estimate is likely just the tip of the iceberg, with the 17 PFAS contaminants mentioned in the study expected to make up less than five per cent of total PFAS entering the environment. The Mersey is considered a natural laboratory to mirror how PFAS contaminants behave in the environment. Unsurprisingly, the authors have concluded that stronger PFAS regulations are necessary to help diminish the harm. Here at EPOC Enviro, we heartily agree. #PFAScontamination #PFASregulation #PFASSolutions #PFASRemediation

Mass of PFAS flowing from River Mersey to the sea among highest in the world, study suggests

Mass of PFAS flowing from River Mersey to the sea among highest in the world, study suggests

chemistryworld.com

Christopher Dainton

Technical Director at Peak Environmental Solutions Limited

9mo

EPOC Enviro OK. So the EPOC headline and the Chemistry World article mis-represents the findings of the underlying study. 68 kg per year IS NOT amongst the highest in the world. The Study actually says that the river catchment PFOS/PFOA YIELD (kg/km2/year] are amongst the highest in the world, not the total loading (kg/year) coming down the Mersey and entering the sea. But the Mersey has a small 2030 km2 watershed (in an industrialised landscape), so that's not surprising when compared compared with a big European river system, e.g. the Rhone at 98500km2. The amount of PFOS estimated to be coming down the Mersey is 9.8 kg/y, cw with 123 kg/y for the Rhone.

David Brydon

Trade effluent consultancy

9mo

The flux method of estimating these loads is no better than an approximation. It's better than nothing but unless vast amounts of data are collected it should never be taken to be anything other than a ball-park figure. Has any stochastic modelling been done with the data? That's what we used to do at UU when looking at river discharges and I do quite a lot of that now for river modelling. Be wary of stretching data too thinly.

Like
Reply
David Burns

Director & Chief Technology Officer (CTO) ➤ Sustain450 Pty Ltd ➤ Lead-inventor PFAS Water & Wastewater Treatment Processes (SAFF & DFF) ➤👨🔬 Green Chemistry, Biomimicry, Nature based Solutions (NbS)

9mo

If PFAS is considered harmful to HH & the Environment according to USEPA and other informed/credible organisations, when will governments introduce fair/effective regulatory criteria paired with a funding mechanism for passive receivers to begin managing/treating/destroying PFAS? These chemicals result from AFFF fire-fighting events, spills or wastewater disposal into the environment, and will continue to persist, bioaccumulate, and disperse further through the ecosystem in the absence of regulatory criteria. The time to introduce regulatory criteria to wastewater is now.

Ian Ross

PFAS Global Practice Leader - CDM Smith

9mo

Large scale PTFE manufacturing was established in Widnes, on the banks of the Mersey in the 1940’s, the plant made 4.6 tons of PTFE between 1947 and 1948, it exploded in 1950..

When you consider the chemicals used / produced, PFAS is the tip of the iceberg.

Like
Reply
Susan Garland

Senior Project Manager at PBS Engineering and Environmental

8mo

Gross

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics