Franklin Annis’ Post

View profile for Franklin Annis, graphic

Military Philosopher, Historian, and Educational Theorist | Author of "Marching with Spartans: The Life and Works of Alden Partridge" | Opinions are my own

I recently ran across Cunliffe's Soldiers & Civilians. It has a pretty good discussion about the conflicts of between an amateur and professional approach to national defense. It is rare to see both arguments considered Captain Alden Partridge's theories presented. I think he misses the mark as I believe what an "amateur" represents may have been incorrectly applied in many cases. For example, is a part-time National Guard Soldier an amateur or a professional? If they are considered amateurs, why do Guard units often outperform Active Duty units. If these part-time National Guard are considered professionals, how are graduates of Norwich University (under the design of Captain Alden Partridge) not also considered professional? I think the amateur vs. professional argument is largely oversimplified and often misapplied. https://amzn.to/3RM9MWD #ad Norwich University #USMA #Militia #Army

Soldiers & civilians;: The martial spirit in America, 1775-1865

Soldiers & civilians;: The martial spirit in America, 1775-1865

amazon.com

J. Anne "Dusty" R.

ACSI Triple Endorsed Advanced Placement English & Humanities Teacher (English, Social Sciences, Spanish)

12mo

While there are some downsides to National Guard culture, National Guard units generally don’t have 100% turn-over every one to four years. National Guardsmen (for better or worse) KNOW their colleagues. They have served, trained, and faught together for YEARS (until Graham-Rudman and ROPMA, which had a tendency to disrupt National Guard units.).

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics