Excaliat (Pvt.) Ltd’s Post

🔍 Stabilizing Heap Exploits in the Linux Kernel Heap-based vulnerabilities, like UAF, DF, and OOB, are challenging to exploit due to the inherent instability of heap sprays. However, attackers often employ clever techniques to stabilize these exploits and improve reliability. Here’s a breakdown of some commonly used stabilization methods: ⚙️ 1. Defragmentation Allocate a large number of objects in the same cache as the vulnerable object to fill up all partially used slabs. This forces the kernel allocator to create fresh slabs, which can then be targeted for exploitation. 🧩 2. Heap Grooming Craft a precise heap layout where the vulnerable object is adjacent to a victim object. This is achieved by allocating many victim objects and then swapping one with the vulnerable object using quick free and malloc operations. 🔄 3. Single-Thread Heap Spray A method to occupy the desired slot by allocating objects either in the same thread or a dedicated thread. This approach is particularly effective after triggering UAF/DF vulnerabilities or before exploiting OOB vulnerabilities. 🤝 4. Multi-Process Heap Spray Similar, to Single-Thread Heap Spray but involves forking multiple processes to allocate payload objects. This parallelization often enhances the chances of hitting the desired memory slot. 📌 5. CPU Pinning Pin the exploit’s execution to a specific CPU using the sched_setaffinity syscall. This prevents task migration, ensuring consistent heap behavior during the exploitation process.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics