Bringing Biodiversity and Climate Change into Decision Making
People have asked me to post a summary of the 16 July event at the Royal Society on how the value of “nature” can be included in decision-making.
Sponsored by the Royal Society, the Government Economics and Social Research Service, DEFRA and HM Treasury, it brought people together from private finance and industry, scientists and economists from academia, and subject specialists from across government. Building on the Royal Society’s recent successful seminar series , in collaboration with the Lord Mayor of London on the same theme. The July event discussed the reality of climate change and biodiversity loss and their interaction, and considered constructive responses, in response to the findings of the 2021 Dasgupta review on the Economics of Biodiversity (https://lnkd.in/ebJcGjnV).
The event was chaired by Sir John Kingman KCB, Chairman of Barclays Bank UK plc, and the keynote speakers were: Steve Waygood, Aviva Investors; Vian Sharif, FNZ Group; Professor Tim Lenton, University of Exeter; Emily McKenzie, from the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD0; Professor Ben Groom, Dragon Capital Chair, Exeter University, joint chair of the cross-government working group on the valuation of biodiversity.
The wide-ranging Q&A discussion covered both climate change and biodiversity loss, and the increasing likelihood that climate tipping points may be reached within the lifetime of many people alive today. This included the importance of research, and the possibility that measures to reverse change may be able to use tipping-point effects to reverse global warming and biodiversity loss.
The increasing awareness of many in the private sector is reflected in an increase in transparency and reporting of nature impacts. Participants welcomed and supported this but recognised that market realities mean the market is blind to costs to society that are without a price in the market. The need for the public sector to both lead by example and to support the internalisation of social costs into the market by the private sector, was understood and generally welcomed.
The Environment Act 2021 provides ways forward and set targets, initially for net zero on climate change, and a no net loss in biodiversity followed by a net gain target. A new biodiversity calculation tool for planning authorities for use in land use planning applications. A generic biodiversity valuation method that is consistent with DEFRA’s natural capitals approach is required for use in spending and investment decisions. The cross-government expert working group on biodiversity valuation, established by HM Treasury and DEFRA has recommended using a target based “marginal cost of replacement” approach for biodiversity valuation. This is similar to the current target based marginal cost approach used for greenhouse gas values.
Associate Professor of Sustainable Finance
7moVery interesting work on a difficult topic! Cannot wait for the paper to go live!