Forest Declaration Assessment’s Post

🤝 Unite – We are all on the same team. 📝 Report – Be proactive and transparent about the actions you are taking. ⚖️ Level the playing field – Ensure that the framework we are all working in isn’t biased and inequitable from the beginning. These are the three urgent next steps to advance equitable and transparent accountability for international forest pledges. These steps were highlighted by our esteemed panelists at the end of the #COP29 side event “Delivering on Forest Ambition. Building Accountability, Equity, and Transparency in Global Forest Policy“ on November 21. The event was hosted by Climate Focus and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) on behalf of the Forest Declaration Assessment Partners and facilitated by Erin D. Matson, Senior Consultant at Climate Focus and Coordinator of the Forest Declaration Assessment. 🚀 We had a brilliant discussion, kicked off by opening remarks from Brenda Mallory, Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Chair Mallory provided an overview of progress that the Biden Administration has made domestically and internationally to advance the U.S.’s commitment to the #GlasgowLeadersDeclaration. 🗣️ Then our panelists laid out some of the biggest barriers to equitable accountability: Jennifer Skene, Director of Global Northern Forests Policy, NRDC – Accountability is the mechanism that ensures that pledges are transformed into concrete action. Transparency and accountability ensure that actors are sufficiently motivated to follow through. Without these, pledgers have no incentive to make good. Moradeke Adelekan, Minister Counsellor, Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs – A big challenge to ensuring equitable accountability? If the pledge itself establishes an uneven playing field. Most international forest commitments focus primarily on tropical forests and ignore ongoing degradation and destruction of boreal and temperate forests. In this way, commitments lay the majority of the responsibility (and blame) on Global South countries. Leticia Guimaraes, Head of Carbon Markets, UNDP – Accountability is underscored by data—and data is collected and reported through accounting systems. But the designs of forest and climate accounting systems under the UNFCCC are biased against tropical forest countries. For example, current accounting systems allow Global North countries to exclude emissions from forest fires (calling these “natural disturbances”). Tropical forest countries, on the other hand, cannot exclude emissions from forest fires because tropical forest fires are not considered natural. However, tropical forest fires are increasing due to climate change, and forest countries have no influence on this. Inequitable accounting frameworks lead to inequitable accountability. 📺 Watch the full recording of the event on YouTube ➡️ https://lnkd.in/dggB6jBp #COP29Azerbaijan #ForestGoals #ClimateAction COP29 Azerbaijan

  • The image shows the moderator and the panelists on stage at the event at COP29.
  • The image shows the four panelists as well as the moderator posing for a group photo after the event.
  • The image shows a screen with information about the event including the event title, date, time, and organizers.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics