Freight Buzz’s Post

View organization page for Freight Buzz, graphic

7,129 followers

Folks, I want to know the truth behind why there is such a big difference in HOW freight carriers quote their customers 🤔 I feel like there is some Jedi-mind trick or psychology at play here 🤨 Let me dive into this knee-deep with three scenarios: 1. Quoting "$2000++" sounds the cheapest, right? It hooks you in with a low-looking number. Only later do you think hold up, PLUS PLUS what?! 😳 …. Oh, you know… just the fuel levy which we won't reveal unless you ask and the GST. It's almost like saying, “Let’s start the conversation here…” 2. Quoting "$2426+" feels more upfront and transparent. They’ve included fuel, but leaving GST aside. It’s like they're saying, "Hey, here’s most of it, but don't forget the taxman!" 3. Then you’ve got the "$2668.60" all-inclusive quote. No hidden surprises. Everything wrapped up in a neat, final number. This approach says, "What you see is what you pay." So, which way is best? Does one of these make customers feel like they’re getting a better deal? 🤷♂️ What do you think? How do YOU like to quote or get quotes? Does the format make a difference? 💬👇 #Logistics #Trucking #SupplyChain #Transport #Freight #InterstateTransport #RoadFreight #TransportServices #Linehaul #Procurement #3PL #Warehousing #Warehouse #FreightForwarder #FreightForwarding #TruckingNews #cargo #Import #Export #OceanFreight #SeaFreight #AirFreight #Australia

  • No alternative text description for this image
Jesse Keasley

Project Coordinator at GEODIS

3mo

I personally prefer to quote without GST - being something a business claims back, most don't really care for it.

The only time I quote ++ is when they want you to quote the future 2025 otherwise it’s included in the rate as you can see from your previous posts fuel can range from 5% to 35% just like the mythical safe rate.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics