Definition of reckless: “heedless of danger or the consequences of one's actions; rash or impetuous.” We advocate for the right increased density in the right locations across Sydney, especially transport hubs. But we need these increases in density, done well – not done recklessly. Otherwise, liveability will be decreased for everyone living in the surrounding areas to where the density has been increased. At the macro level, zooming out – common sense says that if you’re planning a substantial population increase in one district, you look at the projected modelling and ensure that the children represented by those numbers will have somewhere to go to school. But this type of Strategic Planning 101 appears to be completely amiss. And at the micro level, zooming in – NSW teachers are already at crisis point and leaving the industry in droves. Increased class sizes have led to increased workloads and stress, without increased remuneration (although a 3% pay rise was negotiated in October). More kids crammed into classrooms also impacts teaching quality. More students per teacher means less time spent with each one, impacting the overall quality of a child’s education. The NSW Government’s knack for tactical planning on the run, with minimal consultation from industry experts – will bring long-term knock-on effects. Precisely why we will continue to call for evidence-based strategic planning – and for density done well, not done recklessly. https://lnkd.in/gr8sFmhw Alexandra Smith | The Sydney Morning Herald | Zoe Baker | Felicity Wilson MP | Tim James | Kylea Tink #HousingAffordabilty #HousingAffordabilityCrisis #HousingReforms #Schools #densitydonewell
This Labor Government have completely dropped the ball on planning. I made submissions on the TOD and met with the Minister's office and highlighted the acute need for education infrastructure (with a new St Leonards education precinct funded in the Budget yearly since 2018) and the Finalisation Report completely dismissed it. I told them the Cammeraygal catchment issue reflects this much longer term issue, but I have not had any of my calls or emails or letters responded to. Labor is either playing postcode politics or they're just demonstrating their general ineptitude to planning and delivering infrastructure.
Well said. We need the government to move on from this "more housing everywhere" mindset and go back to the basics of good town planning. Sydney will be worse off if they don't.
You would hope the DEP had some idea !…
Yes !! … The Two tiered Planning approach does not work when it comes to infrastructure like schools - very bizarre, especially for Council to target populations without adequate facilities in place …. Bring back the Commision … 👌🏻
Further to the above, we thought this comment (from the article itself) was interesting and valid. Does anyone have any more information on this piece of government land?
I hope this adds to the conversation. Book Analysis of Alan Kohler's The Great Divide: Australia's Housing Mess and How to Fix it: Posted on LinkedIn: https://lnkd.in/dFy5b-Kr
Director at Redshift AA + Lecturer of Practice in Architecture (WSU)
1wThe ‘Density Done Well’ aspect is so missing from all of the 2024 NSW Planning initiatives. What is sadly missing from the understanding is not only how to do it well, but also the need to do it well. If we do it poorly it will further embolden resolve from those that think density is bad - simply because it was not done well.