geneviéve jones-wright’s Post

Juvenile offenses in New York don’t always have to result in harsh penalties. At Arthur L. Pressman, Attorney at Law, we explore alternative sentencing options that focus on rehabilitation and minimizing long-term consequences. Contact us today to learn how we can help protect your child’s future. https://lnkd.in/eVGY2gvW #JuvenileDefense #AlternativeSentencing #NewYorkLaw #LegalHelp #ArthurPressman

Exploring the flaws in Ohio's justice system and advocating for change with Children's Law Center, Inc. and ACLU of Ohio. Check out this insightful article featuring Leah Winsberg, and stay tuned for our upcoming video series addressing this critical issue!

YAC is pleased to invite you to “A Layman's Guide to Youth Justice Laws in Queensland”. This webinar is designed provide a digestible overview of the Youth Justice Act and other relevant laws and will answer your questions about how things pan out in practice. As a start, we will address: - What are “Serious Repeat Offenders”? - What are the sentencing options for serious crimes such as car theft, assault and break and entering? Is parole available? What is a ‘heinous’ crime? - What is the difference between adult and youth sentencing? - When is bail granted, and what conditions can be imposed? What happens when bail is breached? What diversions are available to the courts or police? (such as restorative justice and cautions) - When are convictions recorded? When do adult courts have access to a Children’s Court record? Presented by: Katherine Hayes, CEO, and Damian Bartholomew, Principal Solicitor. Mon 14 October, 4PM - 5PM Click here for more details and to register: https://lnkd.in/guufGb5i

Experienced attorneys can review your case and fight for the best possible outcome, whether a plea bargain or a trial. The attorneys at #PaladinLegalDefenders have successfully represented #juveniles for over 25 years. . https://ow.ly/mXx050S9XJO . #criminaldefense #prison #DefenseLawyer #attorney #OrangeCounty

Under the ambit of criminal justice system, Juvenile delinquency is a global issue deeply established in various sectors of society that exert influence over people’s lives (Hartjen, 2008). Children represent significant assets within our society, shaping the future progress of nations. The prosperity of a nation correlates with each passing generation, but if these assets become involved in unethical behavior, it can destroy societal segments. Juvenile delinquency, fundamentally, involves the violation of laws by individuals who have not yet reached the age of maturity (Bartollas et al., 1985). [....] Read the full article https://lnkd.in/d4kXC25R

This is important viewing for policy makers to understand the practical implications of youth justice legislation. Understanding the realities of the current youth justice system, I hope, will lead to improved policy recommendations and decisions based on evidence and not spin.

While I am not versed in the nuances of NC’s RTA process, this article can spark some much needed dialogue for the field. Raise the Age legislation, was developed as a means to address blanket laws and policy, where in some states, led juveniles to become entangled in an adult system. Even those states who have “embraced” RTA still have juveniles, in juvenile facilities, who are moving through an adult system with the appearance of being treated as a juvenile. Systems which are able to evaluate the needs of the individual and develop a plan that addresses the multi-faceted issues that led to incarceration will be far more likely to develop true rehabilitation. Unfortunately, we are often left with these broad-brush strokes intended to correct issues which then leads to overcorrection, again and again. It is refreshing to see juvenile justice in the spotlight but so often it is that overcorrection, the knee-jerk reaction to the actions of a few, which ultimately causes harm to the many. I do appreciate the debate and discourse that this topic deserves. https://lnkd.in/g2W9evNR

A new proposal for strengthening oversight of the County of San Diego Sheriff's Department would maintain the sheriff's elected status while creating real checks and balances through modest changes to the county's oversight system. Under the proposed reforms, the Citizens' Law Enforcement Review Board (CLERB) would gain the power to appeal rejected recommendations to the County Board of Supervisors for final determination. This change would create a crucial accountability mechanism while respecting the sheriff's electoral mandate. The proposal also calls for creating an Inspector General position to serve as permanent counsel to CLERB, providing professional expertise and continuity to the civilian board's work. The IG would bring investigative experience and institutional knowledge to CLERB's deliberations, while helping craft more effective recommendations. Similar positions have proven successful in other jurisdictions. These changes would require relatively modest amendments to the county charter, making them more politically feasible than wholesale restructuring, The key is creating accountability without undermining the democratic process of an elected sheriff. The Board of Supervisors could consider placing such charter amendments on the ballot as early as 2025.

The Prison Policy Initiative curated a list to offer #policymakers and advocates straightforward solutions that would have the greatest impacts on reducing incarceration and reversing harms experienced by people impacted by the #CriminalLegalSystem, without further investments in that system. https://lnkd.in/gnadWSBR #EndMassIncarceration

The lawsuit filed by the ACLU and HSSK challenging Connecticut’s pay-to-stay law has been resolved, but not before it resulted in major reforms protecting the financial rights of formerly incarcerated individuals. Key outcomes from the case include: ➡ In response to the filing of the action, the state amended the carceral lien statute to exempt all civil recoveries and $50,000 of a former inmate’s assets from collection by the state. ➡ The state agreed to withdraw its liens and collection efforts against the inheritances of the three named plaintiffs. Because the court determined that assessing what constitutes an excessive fine under the United States Constitution requires assessing each individual’s circumstances, the resolution was limited to the three plaintiffs rather than more broadly to similarly situated individuals. This is a significant step forward for justice and financial security for those impacted by incarceration in Connecticut! #JusticeReform #ACLU #FairnessForAll #probono #Connecticut