JP Morgan and BlackRock movement on ESG? Fascinating exclusive insight from the mouths of their Chair CEOs 👉 where is the flow of capital now heading 👉thankyou Brendan Wallace. (skip reading the text 👉 Brendan’s expression is more powerful on understanding the state of play) Brendan also nails the rub of the climate problem. The solution is technical.
Two things about the current moment's ESG sentiment really struck me after attending the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Conference: 1. Larry Fink’s Shift on ESG Larry Fink from BlackRock spoke, and what stood out was the complete absence of any mention of ESG. A year ago, ESG dominated his messaging—it was everywhere. This time, when someone from the audience brought it up, he skirted the topic entirely. Absolutely a noticeable and deliberate shift in tone. 2. Jamie Dimon's Opposition to ESG Jamie Dimon from JP Morgan followed with an incredibly direct and unvarnished speech. He expressed strong antipathy toward ESG, equating it with "woke" policies and saying JP Morgan had gone too far in its embrace of it. His message was distinctly anti-ESG and unapologetically critical. This conference, which featured top CEOs and CIOs from major asset managers, left me thinking about how much momentum ESG has provided for climate, sustainability, and impact funds over the last four years—it’s been massive. But now, with some of the world’s largest capital allocators expressing disinterest at best and outright opposition at worst, I’m wondering what this means for the future. I’ve always felt ESG was an unnatural fit for climate funds, because it lumped together unrelated issues, like ethics and sociology, with the very technical challenge -- it's literally a physics problem -- of solving the energy transition. With this fracturing of ESG gaining traction, I’m curious: How will this shift affect private market capital flows into climate, and what does it mean for climate funds going forward?
Consultant - Offshore Constuction
1wSummary. ESG = woke policies.