HI EVERYONE, DEMOCRACY Democracy is a system of government in which state power is vested in the people or the general population of a state.[2] Under a minimalist definition of democracy, rulers are elected through competitive elections while more expansive definitions link democracy to guarantees of civil liberties and human rights in addition to competitive elections.In a direct democracy, the people have the direct authority to deliberate and decide legislation. In a representative democracy, the people choose governing officials through elections to do so. Who is considered part of "the people" and how authority is shared among or delegated by the people has changed over time and at different rates in different countries. Features of democracy oftentimes include freedom of assembly, association, personal property, freedom of religion and speech, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.The notion of democracy has evolved over time considerably. Throughout history, one can find evidence of direct democracy, in which communities make decisions through popular assembly. Today, the dominant form of democracy is representative democracy, where citizens elect government officials to govern on their behalf such as in a parliamentary or presidential democracy. Most democracies apply in most cases majority rule,[5][6] but in some cases plurality rule, supermajority rule (e.g. constitution) or consensus rule (e.g. Switzerland) are applied. They serve the crucial purpose of inclusiveness and broader legitimacy on sensitive issues—counterbalancing majoritarianism—and therefore mostly take precedence on a constitutional level. In the common variant of liberal democracy, the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but a constitution and supreme court limit the majority and protect the minority—usually through securing the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, such as freedom of speech or freedom of association. #snsinstitutions #snsdesignthinking #designthinkers
Gopi Kandeepan’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
#Democracy is a system of government where power is vested in the people, who rule either directly or through freely elected representatives. It is based on the principles of equality, freedom, and the rule of law. In a democracy, all citizens typically have the right to participate in decision-making processes, either by voting in elections or by having their representatives make decisions on their behalf. Key features of democracy include: 1. Political Equality: All citizens have equal access to the political process, including the right to vote, run for office, and express their opinions. 2. Majority Rule with Minority Rights: While decisions are often made by majority vote, the rights of minorities are protected to ensure fairness and justice. 3. Rule of Law: Laws apply equally to all citizens, and government actions are bound by the law. 4. Free and Fair Elections: Elections are held regularly, and they are open, competitive, and free from corruption. 5. Protection of Fundamental Rights: Democracies safeguard basic human rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. 6. Transparency and Accountability: Governments are transparent in their actions and accountable to the people, often through mechanisms like a free press and independent judiciary. Democracy can take various forms, including direct democracy, where citizens directly vote on laws and policies, and representative democracy, where elected officials make decisions on behalf of the people. #USA #America
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which has implications for minority rights. Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a "pure democracy," the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority. https://lnkd.in/ghCpYNSi
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Democracy 2024 Since 2003 I have been observing how strong the impact of political biases can be in America from a city, state, and federal level by participating in the municipality elections. It is not only hurting American progress Perhaps it is making independent and minor political activists nervous in the matter of income, education, immigration, occupation, business opportunities, happiness, and sometimes racial, political and religious violence. All the legal and illegal tools of federal and state courts are available for the Republicans and the Democrats to enjoy the freedom of political power from the appointments of judges, judicial decision-making , litigation, and millions of political appointees. America is Supposed to be a nation of laws from the judicial power without any political influence. In my City, State, and Supreme Court cases I argued that defendants are very powerful City, State, and federal officials who are benefiting from their positions and power. I am alone independent political activist and victim of discrimination because of my slogan of “ CHANGE “ for the voter registrar offices in America town by town to be operated by Independents to enhance democracy. Democracy supposed to be the rule by the people not by the union of warmongers nor power lovers. By Mehdi — Mehdi LLC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
MAJORITY DICTATORSHIP The definition of democracy as a distributed information network with strong self-correcting mechanisms stands in sharp contrast to a common misconception that equates democracy only with elections. Elections are a central part of the democratic tool kit, but they are not democracy. For democracy is not the same thing as majority dictatorship. A democracy is not a system in which a majority of any size can decide to exterminate unpopular minorities; it is a system in which there are clear limits on the power of the center. These two examples may sound outlandish, but they are unfortunately within the realm of the possible. Hitler began sending Jews and communists to concentration camps within months of rising to power through democratic elections, and in the United States numerous democratically elected governments have disenfranchised African Americans, Native Americans, and other oppressed populations. Appeals against these antidemocratic measures are dismissed by the government’s handpicked judges. Journalists and academics who criticize these measures are fired. However, democracy doesn’t mean majority rule; rather, it means freedom and equality for all. Democracy is a system that guarantees everyone certain liberties, which even the majority cannot take away. Other civil rights include freedom of the press, academic freedom, and freedom of assembly, which enable independent media outlets, universities, and opposition movements to challenge the government. An important thing to note about both human rights and civil rights is that they don’t just limit the power of the central government; they also impose on it many active duties. For example, the right to life imposes on a democratic government the duty to protect citizens from criminal violence. If a government doesn’t kill anyone, but also makes no effort to protect citizens from murder, this is anarchy rather than democracy.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Democracy 2024 Since 2003 I have been observing how strong the impact of political biases can be in America from a city, state, and federal level by participating in the municipality elections. It is not only hurting American progress Perhaps it is making independent and minor political activists nervous in the matter of income, education, immigration, occupation, business opportunities, happiness, and sometimes racial, political and religious violence. All the legal and illegal tools of federal and state courts are available for the Republicans and the Democrats to enjoy the freedom of political power from the appointments of judges, judicial decision-making , litigation, and millions of political appointees. America is Supposed to be a nation of laws from the judicial power without any political influence. In my City, State, and Supreme Court cases I argued that defendants are very powerful City, State, and federal officials who are benefiting from their positions and power. I am alone independent political activist and victim of discrimination because of my slogan of “ CHANGE “ for the voter registrar offices in America town by town to be operated by Independents to enhance democracy. Democracy supposed to be the rule by the people not by the union of warmongers nor power lovers. By Mehdi — Mehdi LLC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Democracy 2024 Since 2003 I have been observing how strong the impact of political biases can be in America from a city, state, and federal level by participating in the municipality elections. It is not only hurting American progress Perhaps it is making independent and minor political activists nervous in the matter of income, education, immigration, occupation, business opportunities, happiness, and sometimes racial, political and religious violence. All the legal and illegal tools of federal and state courts are available for the Republicans and the Democrats to enjoy the freedom of political power from the appointments of judges, judicial decision-making , litigation, and millions of political appointees. America is Supposed to be a nation of laws from the judicial power without any political influence. In my City, State, and Supreme Court cases I argued that defendants are very powerful City, State, and federal officials who are benefiting from their positions and power. I am alone independent political activist and victim of discrimination because of my slogan of “ CHANGE “ for the voter registrar offices in America town by town to be operated by Independents to enhance democracy. Democracy supposed to be the rule by the people not by the union of warmongers nor power lovers. By Mehdi — Mehdi LLC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
**Democracy and Its Critics: A Summary** ### Key Features of Democracy - **Free and Fair Elections**: Citizens vote in regular, competitive elections. - **Rule of Law**: Laws apply to everyone, including leaders. - **Individual Rights**: Freedoms like speech and assembly are protected. - **Separation of Powers**: Power is divided among different branches to prevent abuse. ### Major Criticisms 1. **Plato**: Democracy leads to rule by the ignorant. 2. **Alexis de Tocqueville**: "Tyranny of the majority" can suppress minority rights. 3. **Karl Marx**: Democracy masks the true power of the bourgeoisie and perpetuates class inequalities. 4. **Joseph Schumpeter**: Democracy is just a method for selecting leaders, often controlled by elites. ### Contemporary Issues - **Populism**: Leaders exploit discontent to undermine democratic norms. - **Political Polarization**: Extreme divisions lead to ineffective governance. - **Influence of Money**: Wealthy individuals and corporations shape policies through campaign financing. - **Disinformation**: Spread of false information undermines informed decision-making. ### Strengths of Democracy - **Legitimacy**: Authority derives from the people's consent. - **Protection of Rights**: Democracies tend to protect human rights better. - **Adaptability**: Can reform and respond to challenges. - **Participation**: Encourages citizen engagement and responsibility. ### Potential Solutions - **Deliberative Democracy**: Focuses on informed debate and consensus. - **Technocracy**: Delegates some decisions to experts. - **Proportional Representation**: Electoral systems reflecting diverse voter preferences. ### Conclusion Democracy, despite its criticisms, remains a robust system due to its inclusiveness, accountability, and protection of rights. Ongoing efforts aim to address its weaknesses and enhance its effectiveness in modern governance.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Paradox of Democracy: When Math Says No! Economist Kenneth Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem exposes a fundamental issue in democratic voting systems: true fairness is nearly impossible to achieve. While democracy seeks to reflect the collective will of the people, Arrow’s theorem reveals that no voting system can fairly aggregate individual preferences without encountering contradictions. The Challenge: Arrow showed that with three or more choices, no system can satisfy all of these "fairness" criteria: Non-Dictatorship – No single person controls the outcome. Pareto Efficiency – If everyone prefers one option, it should be selected. Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives – Adding a new option shouldn't change the original preferences. In practice, any voting system we adopt fails at least one of these. Examples Across the Globe: Let’s look at how this plays out in major democratic practices: First-Past-the-Post (FPTP) (used in the US, UK, India): Here, the candidate with the most votes wins. But with multiple candidates, someone can win without a majority – meaning a large portion of voters' voices are underrepresented. Proportional Representation (used in many European countries): This system tries to match the number of seats a party receives with its share of the vote. Yet, smaller parties can end up holding significant power in coalitions, leading to policy deadlocks. Ranked-Choice Voting (used in Australia, Ireland): Voters rank candidates by preference. This system mitigates the "spoiler" effect, but Arrow’s theorem suggests it still can't fully achieve all criteria of fairness. #USelections #Democracydebate #VotingParadox #ArrowImpossibilityTheorem #Kuldeepsinhrana
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Democracy is essential to both the rule of law and the success of capitalism. It provides the foundation for equality, freedom, and the protection of individual rights that allow both legal systems and economies to function effectively. This year alone, over one billion people around the world have cast their votes, participating in the democratic process that shapes their futures. Yes, democracy can be flawed and messy at times. But in the grand scheme of governance, it remains the best system we’ve developed to ensure that power is derived from the will of the people, and that prosperity and justice are available to all. #Democracy #RuleOfLaw #Capitalism #GlobalElections #PowerOfTheVote #Vote
Over a billion have voted in 2024: has democracy won?
economist.com
To view or add a comment, sign in