Chris Harvey’s Post

View profile for Chris Harvey, graphic

Emerging Fund Lawyer

Cooley LLP’s (TheFundLawyer) just published an article on 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻—here are the key takeaways. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗲: • The SEC brought an enforcement action again an adviser managing $137M ("Firm A") for integration with an RIA managing $114M ("Firm B"). • Ownership structure: —No individual owned more than 25% of each Firm A and Firm B —One person owned 50% of Firm A and 20% of Firm B, CCO for both. —The other 50% owner of Firm A was an accounting consultant to Firm B —Two individuals who each owned 40% of Firm B (including its president) co-managed certain funds of Firm A • The SEC found these two firms 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱; because Firm A exceeded the $150M AUM registration threshold, it lost its ERA exemption. 𝗦𝗶𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴: Firm A's penalty was only *$𝟰𝟱𝗞*, as they took steps to clearly separate operations after being notified by the SEC. 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀: 1️⃣ 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸: The SEC evaluates several factors to determine if advisers are operationally integrated, including: • Overlapping ownership and management • Shared office space and operations • Common email domains and phone numbers • Lack of written policies and procedures to enforce separation 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗩𝗖 𝗙𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀: • 𝗘𝘅𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸: Even if managing under $150M AUM, integration with another adviser could force SEC registration. • 𝗡𝗼𝗻-𝗩𝗖 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘀 (𝗡𝗤𝗜𝘀): Investing in these while sharing resources with another adviser may trigger investment adviser registration (RIA). • 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻: Loss of exemption means full SEC registration requirements, including qualified clients, PPMs, marketing rules, custodians, and annual audits or surprise examinations. 💡 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀: • Setup different offices, emails, domain names, etc. at the outset. • Enforce clear separation of operations & personnel between advisers. • Implement strong policies & procedures to avoid shared functions. • Regularly review your exemption status with legal counsel. Check out the full article for more details and insights on how to stay compliant (link in comments).

  • Recent SEC enforcement actions highlight the risks of operational integration for fund managers seeking to avoid registration under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The SEC treats operationally integrated advisers as a single entity, even if they're separate legal entities, potentially affecting their exemption status.
Operational integration is determined by factors including:

Shared office space, email domains, and technology systems
• Marketing materials suggesting partnerships
• Overlapping management roles and investor solicitation
Lack of information security policies between entities

The SEC uses a five-factor test to assess operational independence, considering capitalization, personnel separation, decision-making independence, information sources, and confidentiality.

Recent cases show that even entities with limited ownership overlap can be considered operationally integrated.

The SEC found advisers ineligible for exemptions if they advised non-permitted client types.
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics