Havas International - Paris’ Post

My perspective on the dynamics between the "pen" and the "sword" and how their relationship has shifted throughout history.👇 It's true that the proverb "The pen is mightier than the sword" could very well be the product of an intellectual's desire to elevate the importance of his own tools—ideas, words, and influence—over brute force. This sentiment has been widely accepted in the modern world, where intellectual power and financial clout often dictate the direction of societies and even influence those who wield physical power. In the modern world the man with sword (weapon) often serves a man who is not a warrior. Some one who is the government (politician, bureaucrat) or has money. But erstwhile in many ancient and medieval societies, power was concentrated in the hands of those who could wield a sword effectively—kings, emperors, and warriors. Intellectuals, writers, poets, and scholars often served these rulers, offering wisdom, guidance, or entertainment, but rarely challenging their physical authority. Suggesting that the pen was mightier than the sword would have been a bold—and likely dangerous—claim to make directly to a warrior king. But when the pen and sword are on opposite sides as adversaries, all by themselves, the sword has and will continue to win. India's history provides a significant example of this dynamic. India was once the wealthiest and most culturally advanced civilizations, renowned for its knowledge, arts, administration, and more. However, when faced with repeated invasions and colonization, the power of the "pen" alone wasn't sufficient to counter the force of the “sword." May be due complacency set it in because of our achievements and/or internal divisions, we began to lose the battle with the sword leading to our decline. However when the Pen and the Sword are on the same side they complement and empower each other. Historically, many powerful empires thrived not just because of their military might but also because of the intellectual, cultural, and strategic frameworks that supported their conquests and governance. Intellectuals could inspire, strategists could plan, and diplomats could negotiate, all strengthening the sword's power. And in the shadow of peace and comfort under the umbrella of the safety and protection provided by the warriors the intellectuals, writers, poets thrived. But as I said, when these forces oppose each other—when the pen and sword are adversaries—the sword, in a direct conflict, has often been more decisive. The pen may weaken the sword by influencing opinions, sowing doubt, or strategizing, but once it comes down to a clash of arms, the sword prevails. (Continued in the comments below 👇) #prepareforbattle #warfare #soldier #power #pen #sword #might #bruteforce #streetwar #bharat #training #strategy #intellectual #ideas #fighting #soldier

https://lnkd.in/eJdT86UT Watch Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Importance

https://lnkd.in/eQi2vW7V Watch Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Importance

A person's worth is measured by the worth of what he values..

Unlock the Secrets of Male Vitality with Emperor's Vigor Tonic: Your Ultimate Natural Solution

Lets practice the Easter Papuri #inspirational, #religious, #choir, #mass, #liturgicalmusic, #filipinoliturgicalmusic, #filipinosongs https://lnkd.in/gsiuiyBz

listen for 1 min to clear your spine.

Our most precious possessions are the ones that we can share without depleting them. These possessions actually increase in value when we share them. In contrast, our least valuable possessions are the ones that diminish in when we divide them.

M is the father of N who is the son of V. In order to know the relation of M to P, which of the.. Blood relations are of considerable part of CAT and other MBA entrance exams. Around 3-4 questions make up its logical reasoning section. This topic is a scoring one if you are smooth with the understanding of family relations and family tree otherwise it can prove to be messy, confusing and time consuming. In recent times, we are most likely been detached with our family members and most live in nuclear families unlike in past times when the concept of Joint Families was an apparent part of our lifestyle. Thus, most of us hardly possess the idea of how family relations are intertwined and mixed up and how the branches flow through the family. Problem: M is the father of N who is the son of V. In order to know the relation of M to P, which of the statement/statements is/are necessary? P is the brother of V. The daughter of N is the granddaughter of V. A\) Only \(1\)\* B\) Only \(2\) C\) Either \(1\) or \(2\) D\) \(1\) and \(2\) both Youtube video: https://lnkd.in/d74_cSbr \#nikolays_genetics_lessons