HE - RATION’s Post

Development and financial viability assessment of vegetable oil-based 50% emulsifiable concentrate (50% EC) formulation from Yambean seed extract under the experimental learning programme (ELP) course entitled "Production of Bio-agents and Botanical Pesticides"

🌾 𝐁𝐢𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦 𝐁𝐢𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐫 (𝐁𝐅𝐁𝐅): 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐲 𝐂𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐫𝐢 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚 🌾 Exciting developments are underway in paddy (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation with the introduction of Biofilm Biofertilizer (BFBF), a game-changer for sustainable agriculture. BFBF is gaining popularity due to its remarkable ability to reduce chemical fertilizer usage by about 50%, boost crop yields by 20-30%, and enhance soil carbon sequestration by approximately 30%. Currently, around 16% of Sri Lanka's total rice cultivation area (0.7 Mha) is utilizing the BFBF practice, and its adoption is steadily expanding. Beyond its environmental benefits, BFBF has been reported to increase antioxidant content in rice grains while decreasing heavy metal accumulation, promising a higher quality of rice compared to conventional chemical fertilizer (CF) practices. In our latest study, we compared the primary metabolites—carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids—in rice grains produced under different fertilizer practices: - 100% CF (340 kg NPK/ha) - BFBF (66% CF + BFBF, 2.5 L/ha) - BFBF-based organic (Compost with N >1%, 500 kg/ha + BFBF, 2.5 L/ha) - Reference treatment (66% CF alone) - Control (no amendments) The field experiment, conducted in Agriculture schools at Vauniya, Pelwehera, and Agunakolapalassa, utilized a randomized block design across these locations. Rice grain samples were collected at harvest and analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy to quantify the primary metabolites based on their characteristic diagnostic bands. Results revealed that the BFBF practice produced the highest amounts of proteins and lipids in rice grains, significantly outperforming the 100% CF practice. Additionally, the BFBF-based organic practice showed higher protein and lipid contents than the 100% CF practice, though slightly lower than the BFBF practice. Interestingly, the BFBF-based organic practice yielded the lowest carbohydrate content, while the BFBF and 100% CF practices produced comparable amounts. In conclusion, the adoption of BFBF can significantly enhance rice quality in both chemical and organic fertilizer practices, making it a promising approach for sustainable agriculture in Sri Lanka. Discover more about this revolutionary practice and its potential to transform rice cultivation by reading our full research publication on ResearchGate: https://lnkd.in/gMtHu9ki #SustainableAgriculture #BiofilmBiofertilizer #PaddyCultivation #AgriculturalInnovation #HigherQualityRice #SoilHealth #GreenFarming #NIFSSriLanka #CARNMA

The global Organic Catalyst market was valued at US$ 377 million in 2023 and is anticipated to reach US$ 468.9 million by 2030 witnessing a CAGR of 2.7% during the forecast period 20242030. #GlobalOrganicCatalystMarket #OrganicCatalyst #ChemicalIndustry #Agriculture #Healthcare #FoodAndBeverages #MarketGrowth #CatalystTechnology #MarketOutlook #MarketForecast

Qn?: Should I use organic or synthetic fertilizers? Answer: BOTH! Combining synthetic and organic fertilizers is a winning strategy. Say, you can apply compost/manure before planting and Inorganic fertilizers during critical growth stages Why Organic? 📌 Organic sources provide benefits to both plants and soil. They stimulate beneficial soil microorganisms and improve the structure of the soil. 📌 They provide the secondary and micronutrients plants need, usually absent in synthetic fertilizers. Caution ❗ Organically derived fertilizers typically have a lower NPK analysis (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) than synthetics fertilizers. As a result, It may take a little longer to see results. Here is what you need to know about Inorganic/Synthetic fertilizers. 📌They are best known for being fast-acting and for coming in a variety of forms such as liquid, pellet or granule 📌They are water-soluble and can be taken up by plants almost immediately. This provides a quick-hit of nutrients and rapid growth, even when they won’t last as long in the soil. 📌Farmers must reapply synthetic fertilizers regularly to keep the results from fading. Caution ❗ Synthetic fertilizers give plants a quick boost but do little to stimulate soil life, improve soil texture, or improve your soil's long-term fertility. ✅ Bottom line, Both are equally important and observing them shall ensure sustainable production and Productivity.

Hydro Weed vs Soil: Is Hydroponic Cannabis More Potent? ✨Hydroponic Cultivation: Uses water and nutrient solutions to feed the plants Requires a carefully controlled environment, including temperature, humidity, and lighting Typically involves the use of artificial substrates, such as rockwool, perlite, or coco coir Plants grow faster and produce higher yields, but require more attention and maintenance ✨Soil Growing: Uses soil as a medium for plant growth that is typically full of organic amendments Relies on the natural properties of soil, such as its nutrient content and microbial life Requires less maintenance and attention than growing hydroponically Typically produces smaller yields, but may result in a richer flavor and aroma Next up, let's explore the science behind the potency of cannabis and how it relates to the growing method used ✨Hydroponic Growing: Pros and Cons Hydroponic growing has become increasingly popular in recent years due to its ability to produce high yields of quality cannabis quickly. Here are some of the pros and cons of growing hydroponically: Pros: Plants grow faster and produce higher yields due to the precise control of nutrients and growing conditions Water and nutrient recycling reduces waste and conserves resources Requires less space than traditional soil-based growing methods Potentially less susceptible to pests and diseases due to the sterile growing environment Cons: High initial investment in equipment and setup Requires more maintenance and attention than soil-based growing Precise control of growing conditions can be difficult to achieve, leading to potential risks to the plants

Recommendations for Organic Fertilizer Use in Economic Crop Cultivation in Southeast Asia Southeast Asia is renowned for its rich biodiversity and fertile soils, which support the cultivation of a wide array of economic crops. From rubber and palm oil to coffee and tea, these crops are not only vital for local economies but also contribute significantly to global trade. Importance of Organic Fertilizers Organic fertilizers, such as compost, manure, and green manures, offer several advantages over their synthetic counterparts. They improve soil structure, enhance microbial activity, and promote long-term soil fertility. Moreover, organic fertilizers reduce the risk of environmental contamination and contribute to the production of healthier, more nutritious crops. Given the tropical climate of Southeast Asia, which is characterized by high rainfall and temperatures, the use of organic fertilizers can help maintain soil moisture and reduce nutrient leaching.

Comparative Study of Organic vs. Inorganic Fertilizers in our rice field. 1. Definition ●Organic Fertilizers: Derived from natural sources (e.g., manure, compost, plant residues) and contain carbon-based compounds. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Synthetic or mined fertilizers that contain concentrated nutrients, typically in a chemical form. 2. Nutrient Composition ●Organic Fertilizers: Generally release nutrients slowly, providing a broad spectrum of macro and micronutrients. Nutrient content is variable and less predictable. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Provide specific nutrient ratios (e.g., N-P-K) and have a quick-release mechanism, leading to immediate nutrient availability. 3. Soil Health ●Organic Fertilizers: Improve soil structure, increase microbial activity, and enhance organic matter content, promoting long-term soil health. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Can lead to nutrient leaching and depletion of soil organic matter over time if used excessively. 4. Environmental Impact □Organic Fertilizers: Lower risk of pollution and chemical runoff; support biodiversity and ecosystem balance. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Potential for environmental issues, such as waterway eutrophication and soil acidification, if not managed properly. 5. Cost and Availability ●Organic Fertilizers: Often more expensive and less readily available, especially in large quantities. Requires more labor for application. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Usually cheaper and widely accessible, making them easier to apply on a large scale. 6. Crop Yield and Quality ●Organic Fertilizers: May lead to lower immediate yields compared to inorganic fertilizers, but can improve long-term soil fertility and crop resilience. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: Typically provide higher short-term yields and faster plant growth but may affect the nutritional quality of crops over time. 7. Sustainability ●Organic Fertilizers: Align with sustainable agricultural practices, promoting regenerative systems and reducing reliance on non-renewable resources. ●Inorganic Fertilizers: While effective in boosting production, their long-term sustainability is debated due to potential soil degradation and resource depletion. Conclusion Both organic and inorganic fertilizers have their advantages and disadvantages. A balanced approach that integrates both types, considering local conditions and specific crop needs, may provide the best outcomes for sustainable agriculture.

#Organic #Industrial #Antifungal #Agents #Market Trends, Size, Share, Growth Opportunities, and Emerging Technologies forecast 2029 𝐆𝐞𝐭 𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐬..!!https://lnkd.in/dDRzYYEV Market Dynamics Key Drivers: Rising Demand for Organic Products: #Consumers and industries alike are becoming more aware of the adverse effects of synthetic chemicals. This awareness is #propelling the demand for organic antifungal agents, which are seen as safer and less harmful alternatives. Regulatory Support: Governments and #NGOs worldwide are implementing strict regulations to minimize the use of synthetic chemicals. The recent standards set by the #Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exemplify these efforts, fostering a favorable environment for the growth of organic antifungal agents. Challenges: High Costs: The production of organic #antifungal agents involves high costs due to the expensive raw materials required. This makes them less competitive #against cheaper synthetic alternatives. Limited Availability: Being a #relatively new market, the availability of organic antifungal agents is limited. The number of manufacturers is still small, which constrains market expansion. Effectiveness and #Environmental Concerns: Some fungi have developed resistance to these agents, reducing their long-term effectiveness. Additionally, despite being organic, these #agents can still impact beneficial organisms in the environment. Regional Insights North America: This region #holds the largest market share due to its high demand for sustainable products and strict regulatory landscape. The organic farming movement and the adoption of natural preservatives in the food and #beverage industry significantly drive the market. Asia Pacific: Expected to be the fastest-growing market, driven by the increasing demand for organic #food and beverages and the expansion of industries such as #agriculture, textiles, and construction. Countries like India and China, with their large agricultural sectors, are major contributors to this growth. Key Players: Waga Energy- Sciessent Addmaster UK SANITIZED AG Ultrafresh Modular Solutions #OrganicAntifungalAgents #MarketGrowth #SustainableProducts #OrganicAgriculture #GlobalMarket #RegulatorySupport

📣 🔔 📢 Organic vs Synthetic Fertilizer: Which is Better? Part 2📣 🔔 📢 🎄 🎀 🎈 We can examine the main differences between the two types of fertilizer in 5 points:🎄 🎀 🎈 *🎆 🎇Nutrient Content: Organic fertilizers, which provide plants with various nutrients, release these nutrients more slowly. Chemical fertilizers, on the other hand, deliver nutrients to plants in the fastest way. Although this situation ensures rapid growth of plants, it creates environmental problems by disrupting soil health.🎆 🎇 *🎆 🎇Soil Structure and Fertility: Organic fertilizers, which have a great contribution to improving soil structure, encourage microorganism activity. Chemical fertilizers, on the other hand, do not contribute to soil structure; on the contrary, they can reduce fertility in the long term.🎆 🎇 *🎆 🎇Environmental Impacts: Excessive use of chemical fertilizers can cause serious damage to the environment. These damages can manifest themselves in forms such as water pollution and soil erosion. Organic fertilizers, on the other hand, are environmentally friendly and cause less damage to the environment because they are derived from natural resources.🎆 🎇 *🎆 🎇Long Term Effects: Organic fertilizers that protect and improve soil health promise a sustainable and sustainable agriculture in the long term. Chemical fertilizers, on the contrary, reduce the quality of the soil in the long term.🎆 🎇 *🎆 🎇Plant Health and Taste: Organic fertilizers, which contribute positively to plant health, ensure the production of more delicious products. Chemical fertilizers, on the other hand, can negatively affect product health and taste as they encourage plants to grow faster and synthetic than necessary.🎆 🎇 📣