INDATEL Services’ Post

Middle East History: On April 16, 1457 BC, the Battle of Megiddo took place, marking the first recorded battle in what is accepted as relatively reliable detail. This historic event holds significance as it provides valuable insights into ancient military tactics, strategies, and the geopolitical landscape of the time. The Battle of Megiddo remains a pivotal moment in the history of the Middle East, shaping the course of civilizations in the region for centuries to come. ⚔️🏛️ #MiddleEastHistory #BattleOfMegiddo #AncientCivilizations HaJunk - Business Development

"Exploring the Rich Traditions and Celebrations of Nowruz: A Festive Journey of Renewal and Unity" What is Nowruz? Nowruz is more than just a regular New Year's celebration. It's a time when people in Iran, Afghanistan, and other places come together to welcome the arrival of spring and all the new beginnings it brings. It's like hitting the reset button on life, filled with joy, hope, and renewal. Continue Read: https://rb.gy/yjejoi

🔱⚔️ Prepare for battle in Ancient Allies Tower Defense! Meet your formidable enemies: the Persian Battering Ram and the Persian Catapult. The Persian Battering Ram is a powerhouse, designed to smash through your defenses with relentless force. Can you reinforce your walls and withstand its onslaught? Meanwhile, the Persian Catapult delivers devastating ranged attacks, launching massive projectiles to rain down destruction from afar. Your strategic prowess will be put to the test as you devise tactics to counter these mighty foes. Each encounter demands quick thinking and precise planning. Are you ready to defend your stronghold against these ancient war machines? Download Ancient Allies Tower Defense on Google Play and rise to the challenge! #AncientAllies #TowerDefense #EpicEnemies #PersianBatteringRam #PersianCatapult #StrategyGame #DefendYourCastle #MobileGaming #DownloadNow #GooglePlay

The Third Macedonian War and Battle of Pydna: Perseus' Neglect of Combined-arms Tactics and the Real Reasons for the Roman Victory Get the book USA at https://amzn.to/4g0h4RQ Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/3M9Pgwt The Third Roman-Macedonian War was a disaster for Macedon, a defeat leading to the end of that kingdom's independence. This is usually attributed to an innate superiority of the Roman legionary tactics over the Macedonian system. Graham Wrightson, on the other hand, argues that the blame lies entirely with Perseus, the last king of Macedon. He analyses the whole war, following the primary source accounts and focusing on Perseus’ military decisions and his battlefield strategies. It confirms the prevailing view of the sources that Perseus was too hesitant and non-committal in his early conduct of the war. More significantly it argues that Perseus mishandled the Macedonian army when it comes to combined-arms tactics by adopting a defensive posture, particularly at the final battle of Pydna. The Macedonian military system based on a slow sarissa phalanx is suited entirely to an offensive battle plan coordinating a frontally irresistible phalanx in the centre and a rapid heavy cavalry attack on one wing. Most importantly, though, Perseus refused to spend money to hire 10,000 Gallic horsemen and the lack of cavalry cost him the initiative and the victory. This is a fascinating and thoroughly researched study of these dramatic events that adds fresh insight to the question of the legion's supposed supremacy over the phalanx.

The Third Macedonian War and Battle of Pydna: Perseus' Neglect of Combined-arms Tactics and the Real Reasons for the Roman Victory Get the book USA at https://amzn.to/4g0h4RQ Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/3M9Pgwt The Third Roman-Macedonian War was a disaster for Macedon, a defeat leading to the end of that kingdom's independence. This is usually attributed to an innate superiority of the Roman legionary tactics over the Macedonian system. Graham Wrightson, on the other hand, argues that the blame lies entirely with Perseus, the last king of Macedon. He analyses the whole war, following the primary source accounts and focusing on Perseus’ military decisions and his battlefield strategies. It confirms the prevailing view of the sources that Perseus was too hesitant and non-committal in his early conduct of the war. More significantly it argues that Perseus mishandled the Macedonian army when it comes to combined-arms tactics by adopting a defensive posture, particularly at the final battle of Pydna. The Macedonian military system based on a slow sarissa phalanx is suited entirely to an offensive battle plan coordinating a frontally irresistible phalanx in the centre and a rapid heavy cavalry attack on one wing. Most importantly, though, Perseus refused to spend money to hire 10,000 Gallic horsemen and the lack of cavalry cost him the initiative and the victory. This is a fascinating and thoroughly researched study of these dramatic events that adds fresh insight to the question of the legion's supposed supremacy over the phalanx.

𝐀 𝐆𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐕𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐧𝐚𝐦’𝐬 𝐖𝐚𝐫 𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 If you visit Ho Chi Minh City, you must not miss the Cu Chi Tunnels, located 70 km northwest of the city. The tunnels are an underground network stretching over 250 km, built from the late 1940s and expanded during the Vietnam War. This unique military structure showcases the ingenuity and resilience of the Vietnamese army. During the war, the tunnels served as a hiding place and a strategic base, including living quarters, kitchens, hospitals, weapon storage, and meeting rooms. The sophisticated booby traps and ventilation systems allowed soldiers to live and fight underground for extended periods without being detected. At Cu Chi Tunnels, guests can experience 𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 such as: 👉 Learn about the history of the Cu Chi Tunnels through a documentary film 👉 See the kitchen, living quarters, and meeting rooms. The tunnels have been enlarged for visitors, but you can imagine what it was like before 👉 Discover how different types of booby traps, symbols of guerrilla warfare, were created and set up 👉 See how ingenious Viet Cong soldiers made their weapons 👉 Try firing a real AK-47 at the shooting range (optional) Come and experience the Cu Chi Tunnels to get a glimpse into the resilience and resourcefulness of the Vietnamese people during the war. #365Travel #365travel #DMC #destinationmangement #destinationmangementcompany #localDMC #Vietnamtravel #outboundtravel #outbound #tourism #travelindustry #adventuretours #historicaltours #journeys

Wings of Heritage: The Timeless Art of Pigeon Training in Swat In the skies of Swat Valley, pigeons soar, carrying the echoes of an ancient culture. Rozi and Mansoor, pigeon trainers in Malook Abad, honor a craft passed down through generations—a blend of patience, resilience, and tradition. • In Pashtun society, pigeons and doves hold deep symbolic meaning, representing peace, respect, and sanctity. • A Pashtun proverb captures this essence: “It was a battle of hawks, a dove ended up in the middle,” a reflection of Swat’s intricate history. • Fazal Khaliq of Dawn highlights Swat’s strategic importance, connecting Pakistan, the US, and China. • The valley remains a focal point in shifting alliances, influenced by key players like the Taliban and the army. #PashtunTradition #SwatValley #DocumentaryPhotography Project supported by ISMEO Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale

https://lnkd.in/gFdR7hyD Radar. Technically, at the time of before World War 2, we were at peace, so we were technically a neutral country. So our guard wanyhow we were gonna be at war. No matter what cause they would attack, the Philippines and pearl Harbor pro Harbor was first in the Philippines. So no matter what we were gonna be in the world.  More my conclusionary ideas, the stages of war was already gonna happen. was at the beginning stages.024/12/07/could-a-young-army-pilot-have-prevented-the-pearl-harbor-tragedy/

The Third Macedonian War and Battle of Pydna: Perseus' Neglect of Combined-arms Tactics and the Real Reasons for the Roman Victory Get the book USA at https://amzn.to/4g0h4RQ Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/3M9Pgwt The Third Roman-Macedonian War was a disaster for Macedon, a defeat leading to the end of that kingdom's independence. This is usually attributed to an innate superiority of the Roman legionary tactics over the Macedonian system. Graham Wrightson, on the other hand, argues that the blame lies entirely with Perseus, the last king of Macedon. He analyses the whole war, following the primary source accounts and focusing on Perseus’ military decisions and his battlefield strategies. It confirms the prevailing view of the sources that Perseus was too hesitant and non-committal in his early conduct of the war. More significantly it argues that Perseus mishandled the Macedonian army when it comes to combined-arms tactics by adopting a defensive posture, particularly at the final battle of Pydna. The Macedonian military system based on a slow sarissa phalanx is suited entirely to an offensive battle plan coordinating a frontally irresistible phalanx in the centre and a rapid heavy cavalry attack on one wing. Most importantly, though, Perseus refused to spend money to hire 10,000 Gallic horsemen and the lack of cavalry cost him the initiative and the victory. This is a fascinating and thoroughly researched study of these dramatic events that adds fresh insight to the question of the legion's supposed supremacy over the phalanx.

The Third Macedonian War and Battle of Pydna: Perseus' Neglect of Combined-arms Tactics and the Real Reasons for the Roman Victory Get the book USA at https://amzn.to/4g0h4RQ Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/3M9Pgwt The Third Roman-Macedonian War was a disaster for Macedon, a defeat leading to the end of that kingdom's independence. This is usually attributed to an innate superiority of the Roman legionary tactics over the Macedonian system. Graham Wrightson, on the other hand, argues that the blame lies entirely with Perseus, the last king of Macedon. He analyses the whole war, following the primary source accounts and focusing on Perseus’ military decisions and his battlefield strategies. It confirms the prevailing view of the sources that Perseus was too hesitant and non-committal in his early conduct of the war. More significantly it argues that Perseus mishandled the Macedonian army when it comes to combined-arms tactics by adopting a defensive posture, particularly at the final battle of Pydna. The Macedonian military system based on a slow sarissa phalanx is suited entirely to an offensive battle plan coordinating a frontally irresistible phalanx in the centre and a rapid heavy cavalry attack on one wing. Most importantly, though, Perseus refused to spend money to hire 10,000 Gallic horsemen and the lack of cavalry cost him the initiative and the victory. This is a fascinating and thoroughly researched study of these dramatic events that adds fresh insight to the question of the legion's supposed supremacy over the phalanx.