InteliMerk’s Post

[EN] Rapporteur announces changes to bill regulating artificial intelligence in Brazil The rapporteur of Bill 2338/23, which aims to regulate artificial intelligence in Brazil, Eduardo Gomes, announced that the bill's text will be updated soon to meet sectorial demands and seek a political consensus for its approval. He emphasized the importance of careful regulation to avoid damaging investments and highlighted the lack of global rules. Gomes predicts that the bill will go through decisive weeks and emphasizes that it will suffer further changes during its approval process. He also mentioned the maintenance of sectoral powers for regulatory agencies, coordinated by the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD). Link: https://lnkd.in/dDAP_iz3 Machado, Meyer, Sendacz e Opice Advogados #BrazilAI #BrazilianAIAct

No final do dia? Inócuo. Louvável mas inócuo.

Artificial Intelligence is gaining ground in our daily lives, from treating diseases to fighting climate change, from optimizing energy resources to preventing cyber security threats. It has enormous potential to accelerate innovation in practically every industry and economic sector. How about AI in the EU: are we going to lead in regulation or innovation? Recently in a talk at Nova School of Business and Economics, Karim Lakhani challenged the audience by asking: will the EU lead AI only in regulation? Is the EU standing out for its analysis of ethical and regulatory issues, perhaps missing out on the best innovation opportunities? At Nova SBE we will continue to encourage this and other debates in partnership with the Digital Data Design (D^3) Institute at Harvard.

🚨 [TECH LAW – NEWS – NOVEMBER 2024] ⬇️ 🤖 Draft Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI models (GPAIm) published (https://lnkd.in/gPambXyg) - To ensure legal access to copyrighted content, including compliance with TDM exception limits, Code recommends use of the "robots.txt" protocol - Cyber offenses detection and automated use of GPAIm for AI R&D to be considered as systemic risks, involving additional transparency and cyber-resilience obligations for providers of GPAIm (Art. 55 AI Act) - Signatories commit to each adopt a Safety and Security Framework which shall detail their risk management policies in relation with GPAIm 📜 New EU Regulations published in the Official Journal of the EU (https://lnkd.in/g8sbaw_S ; https://lnkd.in/gxn78-qe) - New Directive on Defective Products: published on 18.11.2024, to be transposed by 9.12.2026, extends defective products liability rules to digital products (e.g. software or products digital components) with presumption of defectiveness in certain cases (e.g. cyber failure) - Cyber Resilience Act: published on 22.11.2024, with first obligations taking effect on 11.09.2026 (e.g. requiring manufacturers to report incidents affecting the security of digital products), strengthens security requirements for digital products throughout their lifecycle 🚩e-Enfance: France's first Trusted Flagger under the DSA (https://lnkd.in/gGcWdxAm) - Arcom grants trusted flagger status to this child protection association: its reports on illegal content are prioritized by platforms (Art. 22 DSA) - The 11 other EU trusted flaggers include authorities and organizations with expertise in IP, child protection or communication 👩⚖️ CNIL fined Ledger €750,000 (decision not published) - Fine was imposed for retaining data for longer than necessary and failure to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure security of data - This follows a 2020 data breach affecting 290,000 clients and comes as Ledger's civil liability is being brought by some of the affected clients before the Judicial Court of Paris (decision expected by early March – Art. 82 GDPR) ⚖️ Removal of fake reviews posted on an online platform and requirement for sufficient evidence (https://lnkd.in/gHwFZxHv) - A claimant is not entitled to request the removal of allegedly fake reviews if its submissions identify or specify the content, date or author of the disputed reviews - A bailiff’s report reproducing reviews that are unreadable due to small font size and presented in a non-chronological order cannot constitute sufficient evidence to support the claim

Looking forward to participating in this conference on AI regulation in Europe on May 21. No surprise I will advocate for a rights-based approach and concrete details soon to be discussed. But the question is why. Simply because since at least the enlightenment, innovation has always been defined by reference to the betterment of human beings and by its contribution to the common good. Opposing innovation to human rights protection is the negation of the human spirit, une “crise de la culture” “Between Past & Future”. Although the future is to be perpetually invented, learning from the dark side of our history would mean to stop repeating ad nauseum this presumption of an inevitable contradiction which assumes at the same time that we have to accept risks, and beyond, violations of human rights, and which in effect limits accountability. Advocating for a rights-based approach to AI regulation is to shed light on this pervert logic and put back the human at the start, center and end of innovation. Thank you very much to Luís Barreto Xavier Católica | Faculdade de Direito (Escola de Lisboa) Abreu Advogados

A Serious issue. IA without control. Too much free IA. Need to be qb quanto baste - as far as needed

For the first time, auditing samples of the European funded projects will be drawn based on risk criteria determined by Artificial Intelligence. A project developed in NOVA IMS Information Management School, led by Professor Pedro Coelho, whose team I had the pleasure to belong to, developed a tool able to optimise audit samples by using risk criteria. Inspeção-Geral de Finanças - Autoridade de Auditoria, the portuguese Audit Autority, used it for the first time last May to base on its audit work reffering to the certified 2023 expenditure. The European Commission intends to expand the use of this tool to other Member-States soon. #AI #NOVAIMS #auditofoperations #Europeanfunds #sample #risk

Pesquisa empírica do Edemilson Paraná e do Oscar Arruda sobre como os institutos nacionais de estatísticas estão capturados pelo lobby das big techs a fim de não mensurar ou construir bons indicadores de economia digital especialmente no Sul Global. O texto mostra também como os discursos sobre data for development e data for good trazem embutidos esta agenda. Atualmente, os dados sequer são contabilizados nas contas nacionais dos países. "Our studies demonstrate that, in the 21st Century, Big Tech has advanced over official statistics. In our understanding, this can compromise the statistical sovereignty of national states, especially for countries in the Global South. Our empirical research demonstrates that this process occurs with the active involvement of companies such as Microsoft and Google in lobbying, financing, research, and development actions that can lead to changes in global statistical production and coordination structures, including impacts on national statistical systems. These actions are implemented through the ‘Big Data for official statistics’ and ‘data revolution for development’ agendas, which involve International Organizations, Big Tech, NGOs and other private companies, and National Statistics Institutes from the Global North and Global South." https://lnkd.in/dv-c5F7R #statistics #bigtechs #lobbying

Confira meu post no blog sobre "CLÁUSULA ARBITRAL e Chat GPT"! https://wix.to/sKD2T3j #meunovopost

One more iTechLaw European Conference. This time in Munich. An opportunity to meet old friends and seek alternatives to address the major issues of Digital Law today. Want to know what the main debates were this year? Watch below! #ITLMunich2024 #iTechLaw #AI #Technology #AI #inteligenciaartificial #ProteçãodeDados #Cibersegurança #Ciberincidentes #DireitoDigital #Tecnologia